answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Notwithstanding todays modern conversion of 999 into Roman numerals which is now considered to be CMXCIX inasmuch that the ancient Romans would have probably added together the equivalent of 777 and 999 in either of the following formats:-

Abridged format:

DCCLXXVII+IM = MDCCLXXVI => 777+(1000-1) = 1776

Elongated format:

DCCLXXVII+DCCCCLXXXXVIIII = MDCCLXXVI => 777+999 = 1776

QED

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

6mo ago

To add 777 and 999 in Roman numerals, you can first convert the numbers to their Roman numeral equivalents. 777 is DCCCLXXVII and 999 is CMXCIX.

Method 1: Add the two Roman numerals: DCCCLXXVII + CMXCIX = MDCCC LXXVI

Method 2: Convert both numbers to their Arabic numeral equivalents, add them together, and then convert the sum back to Roman numerals: 777 + 999 = 1776, which can be written as MDCCLXXVI in Roman numerals.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How would you add together 777 and 999 in two different ways with all work shown entirely in Roman numerals?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

How would you actually add together 1666 and 1999 in two different ways entirely in Roman numerals throughout both calculations with explanations?

See answer to question: ' How do you add together 1666 and 1999 in two different ways using Roman numerals'


What is the sum of 1999 and 2014 added together in two different ways entirely in Roman numerals with explanations?

MIM + MMXIV = MMMXIII or MMCXCIX + MMXIII = MMMXIII There is only one way to write the solution (3013)


What is a 5 letter word made up entirely of roman numerals?

The five letter word MIMIC can be formed from Roman numerals but as the individual numerals are in the wrong order it isn't a real Roman numeral.


What does CCCXCIV mean in Roman numerals?

In today's modern usage of Roman numerals, CCCXCIV represents 394, but the ancient Romans would have converted and notated the equivalent of 394 into Roman numerals entirely quite differently.


How would you work out 1776 plus 549 in two different ways and 1776 minus 549 in two different ways but working out all four calculations entirely in Roman numerals with explanations?

Roman numerals are entirely inappropriate for doing such calculations. I believe the people in Roman times did such calculations on an abacus or something similar - which is basically similar to converting them to the Arabic numbers we use. If you really want to do it in Roman numerals - which is basically NOT a good idea - you would have to keep the thousands, hundreds, etc. separate, and handle carry (for addition) and borrowing (for subtraction).

Related questions

How would you actually add together 1666 and 1999 in two different ways entirely in Roman numerals throughout both calculations with explanations?

See answer to question: ' How do you add together 1666 and 1999 in two different ways using Roman numerals'


What is the sum of 1999 and 2014 added together in two different ways entirely in Roman numerals with explanations?

MIM + MMXIV = MMMXIII or MMCXCIX + MMXIII = MMMXIII There is only one way to write the solution (3013)


What is a 5 letter word made up entirely of roman numerals?

The five letter word MIMIC can be formed from Roman numerals but as the individual numerals are in the wrong order it isn't a real Roman numeral.


Could you please show us how to add together 1449 and 550 using Roman numerals?

Convert from Roman numerals to Arabic numerals, add, convert back to Roman numerals.


What does CCCXCIV mean in Roman numerals?

In today's modern usage of Roman numerals, CCCXCIV represents 394, but the ancient Romans would have converted and notated the equivalent of 394 into Roman numerals entirely quite differently.


What does the roman numerals mmmcccxiv together mean?

3314


How would you work out 1776 plus 549 in two different ways and 1776 minus 549 in two different ways but working out all four calculations entirely in Roman numerals with explanations?

Roman numerals are entirely inappropriate for doing such calculations. I believe the people in Roman times did such calculations on an abacus or something similar - which is basically similar to converting them to the Arabic numbers we use. If you really want to do it in Roman numerals - which is basically NOT a good idea - you would have to keep the thousands, hundreds, etc. separate, and handle carry (for addition) and borrowing (for subtraction).


How would to add together 1999 and 3001 in two different ways showing both calculations entirely in Roman numerals?

When in Rome do as the Roman do and the ancient Romans would have probably added together 1999 and 3001 in either of the following ways:- IMM+MMMI = (V) => (2000-1)+3001 = 1000*5 = 5000 MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII+MMMI = (V) => 1999+30001 = 5000 Note that in todays modern configuration of Roman numerals 1999 is now considered to be MCMXCIX


When was Roman Numerals changed to numbers?

Bear in mind that Roman numerals actually are numbers, they are just not the kind of numbers that we presently use, which are called Arabic numerals. Arabic numerals were first used in Europe in the year 976 AD. Roman numerals still have not entirely fallen out of use, although for most purposes we use Arabic numerals.


What is the sum of 999 plus 14 plus 1987 added together in two different ways but showing all work and answers entirely in Roman numerals?

Cmxcix + xiv + mcmlxxxvii = mmm. It should be all in capital letters, but the system changed them.


Name a 5 letter palindromic word made up entirely of roman numerals?

CIVIC


What's the roman numeral w?

W existed in the "medieval roman numerals", they were different from the modern roman numerals we know and use today. W was 800, in modern roman numerals that would be DCCC.