Want this question answered?
Yes, participate is the correct spelling.Some example sentences are:I would like to participate in the class.Those who participate will be rewarded.
Endanger is the correct spelling.Some example sentences for the word are:His behaviour would endanger the public.Too much human agriculture will endanger many species of animals.
The phrase would be written, "That's yours".
It is not correct. The correct sentence should be as follows: "At what time would you come?" or 'At what time would you like to come?" or "At what time will you come?" or "would you come at what time?" or "Will you come at what time?" or "At what time will you like to come?" The verb 'should' is not used while asking questions since should is used a modal verb--which does not change its form with first, second or third person nouns or pronouns--used sparingly almost in imperative sentences and in sentences that suggestive of advice.
This would usually be correct, as in, "Several deaf people in the audience praised your signing during the lecture", or "Your signing a check is required for a bank where you have a checking account to honor the check when presented." "Signing" in these sentences is a special verb form called a "gerund", which functions in sentences as a noun and therefore can properly be modified with a possessive adjective such as "your". In another kind of sentence, however, "you" would be preferred to "your", for example, "You, signing that check, were a picture of extreme reluctance."
The same difference there would be between words spelled incorrectly and correctly.
All the answers are correct.
The puppies are available for free would be the correct sentence to use.
No. Dromedary is the correct name for the one humped, or arabian camel.
If I were you, the first thing I would do is learn to write. What you've written is at best, hard to follow. No punctuation, rolling sentences, misspelled or incorrectly used words. I was under the impression, that as a requirement of employment, the folks we have guarding our prisoners could at least enunciate.
Would you like me to provide an example of two sentences combined with and separated by a comma?
The correct form is "Who has" when referring to a singular subject, and "Who have" when referring to a plural subject. For example, "Who has the keys?" and "Who have the keys?" would be correct based on the number of keys being referred to.
No, it is not. "Whose client is Mr. Jackso[n]" or "Who is the client of Mr. Jackso[n]" would be correct sentences.
Well if you think about it- neither one is correct as it would be: To whom have you written to. or What have you written. or It says that you have written..... I hope this helped xx
No. While "everywhere" is a relative adverb here, replacing the more formal "in every place that", the sentence is not correct due to the lack of punctuation. It would be better written as You can search everywhere I live; you can trace everywhere I am.Even better would be to separate it as two sentences.
Both of those sentences are correct but he first one would be more appropriate to say.
The only correction that I would offer is to make that question into two sentences, which would read as follows: Somebody's using my old bag. Is this sentence correct?