No, it is not. "Whose client is Mr. Jackso[n]" or "Who is the client of Mr. Jackso[n]" would be correct sentences.
The correct way to say the sentence is, "Mr. Jones and he ran the fair."
The sentence 'Correct the sentence.' is a correct sentence. The subject is implied 'you'; the verb is 'correct'; the direct object is 'sentence'; and it is a complete thought. These are all the elements required for a complete sentence.
'Mr Ram, accompanied by his friends, was assembled at the lawn' would be grammatically correct.
The relative pronoun is whom, but it is the incorrect case. The relative pronoun 'whom' is the objective case which functions as the object of a verb or a preposition.The correct sentence is, "Mr. Moon who you have met is my assistant."A correct sentence for 'whom' is, "Mr. Moon to whom you were introduced is my assistant."
Mr and Mrs is correct or Mrs and Mr is correct
No. Should be: Mr Jacob has been appointed ...(assuming it has already happened) Mr Jacobs is being appointed .... (if it is currently happening - this is an unusual though correct construction)
The stories Mr. Feinstein told, were really scary.
In the US it is normally Mr. and Mrs.
The statement is a little bit awkward; you might consider rewording it. I would suggest something like "The statement for your client, Mr. Smith, is in the mail."Another ViewThe sentence is more than "a little bit awkward." However, as written, there should be two commas, one before "Mr. Smith" and one after, because Mr. Smith is probably not the reader's only client. In this case, I fear, the addition of the commas would manage to make the sentence even more ungainly. By the context, I would assume that the sentence is part of a business letter, and the letter is bound to have a "Subject" or "Re" in its heading, the purpose of which is to briefly tell the reader what the letter is about. It's difficult not to infer that the reader, before encountering this clumsy conglomeration, already has a fair idea that Mr. Smith is involved, and that there's a statement being discussed, and that Mr. Smith is his client. Under such circumstances, there's nothing wrong with saying simply, "Mr. Smith's statement is in the mail," thus saving the hand-wringing over comma placement.
The short answer is: No. The long answer is: As written, the sentence doesn't make sense and I'm having trouble figuring out what it's supposed to mean, so I'll take a guess and suggest a few correct versions:You have discussed this with Mr. Dissanayaka before. (Meaning: You and Mr. D. have talked about this.)Have you discussed this with Mr. Dissanayaka before? (Same as above except in a question form.)You have been discussed with Mr. Dissanayaka before. (Meaning: Mr. D. and someone else have talked about you.)
What if your teacher, Mr. Toscano, has never had measles, mumps, or chickenpox?
Tom Robinson, but before him was Mr. Cunnington.