Patrick Henry believed the Constitution gave too much power to the Federal government. The Federal government needed some power to make the new United States a country instead of a loose alliance of states.
sounds like an essay
good luck bud
The island of Taiwan.
Most believe that he was born in Haiti, but there is no documentary evidence to support or refute that belief.
Just a _wild guess_ that it was Christ Church. I would love to know if anyone can refute this.
what are the other commonly esposed answers to "yali's question," and how doe Jared diamond addres and refute each of them?
He did NOT save Jamestown. He was only there a very few months and he lied about his contribution to the settlement in a book he wrote several years later. He also made up the story about Pocahontas and she died young so couldn't refute his story. The man who did save Jamestown was the husband of Pocahontas and gave tobacco seeds to the colony. That was John Rolfe.
The opposite of refute is to prove correct.
I have nothing to refute your hypothesis.
The lawyer had no argument to refute the evidence against his client. Refute means to disprove.
Are you able to refute the testimony that the witness just presented.
Refute
The plural of refute is refutes. As in "the company refutes the claims".
Sally will refute Ben's false accusation
Fruit, suit, and mute all rhyme with refute.
A compound sentence is made up of two or more independent clauses. An example of a compound sentence that uses the word "refute" would be: You continue to refute my theory, so I will no longer discuss it with you.
The lawyer was going to refute the plaintiff until her client was proven innocent.
To refute a claim with a counterclaim, you must support your argument with evidence to ensure the validity of your claims.
The refutation theory of natural inspiration argues that people naturally seek explanations for phenomena, but these explanations are not always correct. It suggests that humans may attribute supernatural causes to natural events due to their cognitive biases or lack of scientific understanding. This theory challenges the notion that supernatural explanations are evidence of divine inspiration.