answersLogoWhite

0

Patrick Henry

Patrick Henry is most famous for his fiery speech which ended "Give me liberty or give me death." A self taught lawyer, he was instrumental in contributing to public opinion during the American Revolution.

476 Questions

How do Patrick Henry's comments reflect the difference between the ideals of the war of independence and the reality of life in those times?

Patrick Henry's comments, particularly his famous phrase "Give me liberty, or give me death," reflect the idealistic fervor and commitment to freedom that characterized the American Revolutionary War. However, the reality of life during that time was often harsh and challenging, with many individuals facing economic hardship, political turmoil, and personal sacrifice. Henry's words capture the spirit of the revolutionary cause, but they also serve as a reminder of the sacrifices and struggles that were necessary to achieve independence.

What is a busy body?

A person who involves themselves in other peoples affairs, when not invited to assist.

What was Patrick Henry's military experiences?

Patrick Henry did not have much military experience. He served as a colonel during the American Revolutionary War, but did not see much active combat. He was primarily known for his political leadership and oratory skills.

What was Patrick Henry mother name?

Patrick Henry's mother's name was Sarah Winston Syme Henry.

Did Patrick Henry give his Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death speech before or after the Battle of Lexington?

Patrick Henry gave his "Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death" speech before the Battle of Lexington. It was delivered on March 23, 1775, while the Battle of Lexington occurred on April 19, 1775. The speech was a call to arms and served as a rallying cry for the American colonists in the early stages of the Revolutionary War.

Was Patrick Wilson a federalist?

No, Patrick Wilson was not a Federalist. He was a politician and lawyer from Virginia who was associated with the Anti-Federalist faction and opposed the ratification of the United States Constitution.

What was the message Patrick Henry stirring speech that called for war?

Patrick Henry's stirring speech, delivered in 1775, called for war against Great Britain. The crux of his message was captured in the famous line, "Give me liberty or give me death!" Henry argued passionately for the need to take up arms against British oppression and asserted that peaceful negotiations had failed. His speech played a crucial role in mobilizing support for the American Revolution.

What is it to give in?

To give in means to surrender or yield to something or someone. It can refer to giving up an argument or contention, or it can also refer to giving in to temptation or pressure. Giving in often implies compromising one's own beliefs or desires in favor of someone else's or to avoid conflict.

How did Virginia lawyer and politician Patrick Henry contribute to the American Revolution?

Patrick Henry was a vocal advocate for American independence from Great Britain. His fiery speeches, such as his famous "Give me liberty or give me death" speech, inspired many colonists to join the revolutionary cause. He played a crucial role in persuading Virginians to support the revolution and was a delegate to the Continental Congress, where he helped shape early American policies.

'What made Patrick Henry write his speech 'Give me Liberty Or Give me Death'?

he got tired of people changing everthing like taxes, and he wanted to show the people that you can have freedom. he also was a horny basterd...

Did Patrick Henry have any sisters or brothers?

Patrick Henry was the second of ten brothers and sisters...i dont konw their names.

Why did important leaders like Samuel Adams John Hancock and Patrick Henry not attend the constitutional convention?

The important leaders Sam Adams, John Hancock, and Patrick Henry did not attend the convection because, they feared that the strong national government would endanger the rights of the states

How was Patrick Henry talent for oratory particularly suited to his time?

Yes, Patrick Henry was a great orator and speaker. As a champion for freedom and rights, Henry spoke out against British tyranny on all levels.

How many children did Patrick Henry have with his first wife?

Patrick Henry had 2 wives.his first was Sarah and his 2nd was dorothea.:)

What was the statement that Patrick Henry said that you all know now?

He gave the speech "Give Me Liberty, Or Give Me Death" speech called Treason.

How does Patrick Henry describe King George III?

Liberty or Death
March 23, 1775

No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House. But different men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining as I do opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely and without reserve. This is no time for ceremony. The question before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.

Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it.

I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past. And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves and the House. Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received? Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss. Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with those warlike preparations which cover our waters and darken our land. Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled that force must be called in to win back our love? Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation; the last arguments to which kings resort. I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motive for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us: they can be meant for no other. They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging. And what have we to oppose to them? Shall we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years. Have we anything new to offer upon the subject? Nothing. We have held the subject up in every light of which it is capable; but it has been all in vain. Shall we resort to entreaty and humble supplication? What terms shall we find which have not been already exhausted? Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves. Sir, we have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne! In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation. There is no longer any room for hope. If we wish to be free--if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending--if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained--we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of hosts is all that is left us!

They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. The millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable-and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.

It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace-but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!

What did pactrick Henry do to oppose the stamp act?

because he felt as if the british were being unfair and he showed no loyality to the king. no taxation waithout representation.

wrong!!!!!!

What is a similarity between George Washington's letter and Patrick Henry's speech?

MAcolm X cites Patrick Henry and George Washington as leaders he learned about who fought with extremism. Macolm X even quotes "liberty or death" more than once in his Ballot or Bullet speech. Speech http://www.cis.aueb.gr/Besides%20Security/TALKS/TALKS-10-X%20(The%20Ballot%20or%20the%20Bullet).pdf

How old is Patrick Henry?

Patrick Henry was born on May 29, 1736 and died on June 6, 1799. Patrick Henry would have been 63 years old at the time of death or 279 years old today.