import java.util.*;
public class tryint{
public static void main(String[] args){
Scanner s=new Scanner(System.in);
int w;
try{
System.out.print("Input number:");
w=s.nextInt();
System.out.print("Input number is "+w);}
catch(Exception wi){System.out.println("not an integer");}
}
}
synchronous input means that the flipflop reads input only at posedge or negedge of the clock.
Only 1 exists, and it is "999"
a neon number is that wheresum of digits of square of the number is equal to the number ...for example --sample input => 9sample output =>9*9 = 81,8+1=9therefore,9 is a neon numberPRACTICALLY, THERE IS NO OTHER SUCH NUMBER...ITS ONLY A THEORETICAL CONCEPT OF NEON NUMBERS !!
Technically, an OR gate could function with only one input, in which case it would perform the same as if it was not present; when its only input goes high, it would go high, and when the input goes low, it would go low. As a practical matter, the only useful purpose of a single input OR gate would be to have it act as a simple diode, which would be more efficient to simply have a diode in its place.
No. Not unless the value contained is an integer value, and the number of digits is less than the resolution of the int type. Most doubles support about 15 digits of resolution, while 32 bit integers only support 9. You might be successful in a 64 bit int format, but you still need to consider the maximum value.The only thing the type cast buys you is elimination of the compiler warning. With the type cast, you are telling the compiler that you know what you are doing.
All digits all part of the set of integers.
How many
There is only 1, the number 54.
The 2-digit number must be 20, because it is the only 2-digit number whose sum of its two even digits, 2 + 0 = 2, is greater than the product of its two even digits, 2 x 0 = 0. Moreover, 20 is a product of the two consecutive integers 4 and 5.
no. Only whole numbers are integers like 1 or 50 or 1000. Any number with no digits on the right of the decimal point is an integer
1, 2, 4, 5, 8, and 10, so only 6 digits.
The answer depends on the degree of precision. If only integers are to be represented, then 6 digits would be enough because 165 = 1,048,576 is bigger than a million.
Integers ending in 0 are ambiguous cases. The measurement could be accurate to the units digit and in that case all three digits are significant. But is could be accurate to the nearest ten, in which case, only the first two digits are significant.
There are 45 integers between 11 and 999999 which consist of only one digit being repeated. There are 831430 integers that contain at least one repeated digit.
There are no such integers.
If we restrict the discussion to integers (whole numbers), then there are only two possibilities: 1 x 86 2 x 43
The largest digits number with only 2 digits alike is 99