III is 3 in Arabic numerals.
The roman numeral of Alexander the Great is Alexander III [356-323 BCE]
There was nothing wrong with theGreekand Roman numbering systems. They were complicated. They have beenreplacedby the Arabic numeral system because it is much easier to use.
Chinese numeral characters, which are part of the written Chinese language, are still in use. Arabic numerals are also widely used in China.
Take a U shape and turn it upside down - that is the hieroglyph for the numeral 10. Then add three short vertical strokes: III (meaning 3) and you have a total of 13.
Normally the III means that "John Doe III's" father and grandfather are named (grandfather) "John Doe Sr." and (father) is named "John Doe Jr.". Which would change their names to "John Doe I" and "John Doe II" when "John Doe III" is named. The naming can also skip a generation or even a nephew or grandnephew can continue the name. I have seen the use of the roman numeral system with female names also.
The Roman numeral MC III is equivalent to the Arabic numeral 1103.
It is the Hindu-Arabic numeral system.
50 is an Arabic numeral and its Roman equivalent is L
The Roman numeral of CCLI is equivalent to the Arabic numeral of 251
MMCVI is not an Arabic numeral. It is the Roman numeral for 2106.
It's already an Arabic numeral
Exactly as it is 27 which is an Hindu-Arabic numeral and as a Roman numeral it is XXVII
The Arabic numeral eqivelent of 1776 is 1776. the Roman numeral for 1776 is MDCCLXXVI.
The Roman numeral of CCCL is equivalent to the Arabic numeral of 350
The equivalent Roman numeral of L as an Hidu-Arabic numeral is 50
The Roman numeral of CCLX is equivalent to the Hindu-Arabic numeral of 260
The Roman numeral of CCLXII is equivalent to the Hindu-Arabic numeral of 262