Yes of course your are responsible because your are the owner of the car
no. It could be, depending on the details.
Police are responsible for controlling crime.
The sound that drives the narrator to confess the crime is a heart; (the heart of the man he killed or the his own?)
No, an IP address alone is not sufficient evidence to convict someone of a crime. Additional evidence is typically needed to establish a connection between the IP address and the individual responsible for the crime.
No, "guilty" is an adjective, not a verb. It is used to describe someone who is responsible for a crime or wrongdoing.
Yes. A crime happened. If the other person tried to kill you, then the other person is responsible for the crime even though you did the killing. If it was simply a fight and you suddenly decided to kill the other guy, then you committed a crime.
No. That just drives it underground.
Someone that can make sure the suspect and the victim are settled down. Make sure police and ambulance are there before someone has passed out or ran away.
Suspect and culprit are not synonymous. "Suspect" refers to someone who is thought to be involved in a crime but has not been proven guilty, while "culprit" specifically denotes the person who is responsible for committing a crime.
The word "culprit" can be defined as a few things really. The main definition of the word "culprit" is that of someone who is considered a criminal of some crime.
Its a work of society. We have nothing to worry about when we give it to someone who is responsible for autonomous reactions to crime etc.
The antonym of sleuth is likely culprit, as a sleuth is someone who investigates or solves crimes, while a culprit is someone who is responsible for committing a crime.