No, an IP address alone is not sufficient evidence to convict someone of a crime. Additional evidence is typically needed to establish a connection between the IP address and the individual responsible for the crime.
Sufficient probable cause and evidence to place the defendant inside the location which was burglarized.
If, at the time of arrest, there was sufficient "probable cause" to believe that you committed the crime - and if the information was presented to a judge or grand jury and they handed down an indictment based on it - yes, you can be charged. It will be up to the prosecution to prove at trial that there IS sufficient evidence to convict you of the crime.
A Picture Of Him...
In a court of law, the number of witnesses needed to convict someone varies depending on the case and the evidence presented. Generally, there is no specific number of witnesses required for a conviction. The decision to convict someone is based on the strength of the evidence and whether it proves the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt.
A confession alone is not always enough to convict someone of a crime. Other evidence, such as physical evidence or witness testimony, is typically needed to corroborate the confession and prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Confessions can be challenged in court if they are obtained improperly or under duress.
No, it's not enough evidence to convict someone. You know that they were there, and you can definitely consider them a suspect, but you can't make a definite conviction.
Anything that can legally be admitted that would convince a juror that someone has committed a crime.
with no evidence against you any half-way decent lawyer would probably get you proven not guilty.
YesAnother View: No, not directly. "Word of mouth" may be enough to bring drug trafficking to the attention of law enforcement, or lead their investigtion in the right direction, but the evidence that is collected and used to convict the defendant(s) must be collected in accordance with the law and the rules of evidence.
If the charges are dismissed, it can be charged again if sufficient additional evidence is presented.
There must be testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act in order to convict a person of treason. See Article III, Section 3, Clause 1 of the US Constitution.
The opposite can be "incriminate" (show evidence of blame) or to "convict" (find guilty of a charge).