Anything that can legally be admitted that would convince a juror that someone has committed a crime.
What specifically are you asking about? Admission of guilt? Eyewitnesses? Videotape? Fingerprint evidence, DNA evidence? Apprehended with the money on you?
Sufficient probable cause and evidence to place the defendant inside the location which was burglarized.
No, an IP address alone is not sufficient evidence to convict someone of a crime. Additional evidence is typically needed to establish a connection between the IP address and the individual responsible for the crime.
In a court of law, the number of witnesses needed to convict someone varies depending on the case and the evidence presented. Generally, there is no specific number of witnesses required for a conviction. The decision to convict someone is based on the strength of the evidence and whether it proves the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt.
The difference is: in civil trials it is a "preponderance of evidence," whereas in a criminal trial it is "beyond a reasonable doubt."
A confession alone is not always enough to convict someone of a crime. Other evidence, such as physical evidence or witness testimony, is typically needed to corroborate the confession and prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Confessions can be challenged in court if they are obtained improperly or under duress.
Sixty Seven senators are needed to convict a government official in an impeachment trial.
"Proof beyond a reasonable doubt."
All twelve.
12 minimum
Not necessarily. It would depend on how much other evidence there is. By itself, DNA on a cigarette only proves that the suspect was physically present at the scene of the crime. It proves he was there at some unknown time, but it does not prove that he was there during the commission of the crime or that he committed the crime. It is a compelling piece of evidence, but it would need to be accompanied by other evidence, in order to ensure a conviction. For example, if eyewitnesses saw the suspect's car fleeing the scene, and if bullets matching those used in the crime were found at the suspect's home, THAT, combined with the DNA on the cigarette, would probably be enough to convict.
Under the U.S. Constitution, proof needed to convict a person of treason is very high. There must be either two eye witnesses to the overt act of treason or a confession by the defendant in open court.