You are talking about causation. Judging form your statement B is dependent on A. However trends can be coincidence.
An example would be on Fridays everyone wore purple. On any other they did not wear purple. Does not mean that people can not wear purple on other days it could be just peoples moods or laundry day. It could be other factors acting making the effect.
A and B could be dependent on C meaning that if C doesn't happen neither of them can happen. This means that you can not measure A's effect on B because of C.
One example that proves this reasoning wrong is the concept of "correlation does not imply causation." Just because two events are related (A and B), it doesn't necessarily mean that one caused the other. There could be other factors at play that influence both events or the correlation could be coincidental.
An example of prejudice caused by inductive reasoning could be assuming that all members of a particular group are lazy because you have observed a few individuals from that group who were not motivated. This generalization based on limited observations can lead to unfair bias and discrimination against the entire group.
An example of prejudice caused by deductive reasoning is the belief that all members of a certain group are untrustworthy based on a few negative encounters with individuals from that group. This generalization ignores the diversity within the group and unfairly taints all its members with the same negative perception due to deductive reasoning.
Three key things caused by the Enlightenment include the rise of secularism and separation of church and state, the spread of democratic ideals and the belief in human rights, and the development of scientific reasoning and advancements.
An example of false causality would be, "Every time I wear my lucky socks, my team wins. Therefore, my lucky socks are causing my team to win." This is a false causality because wearing the socks and the team winning are not necessarily connected in a cause-and-effect relationship.
Inductive reasoning takes a specific representative case or facts and then draws generalizations or conclusions from them. Inductive reasoning must be based on a sufficient amount of reliable evidence. In other words, the facts you draw on must fairly represent the larger situation or population. Example:Fair trade agreements have raised the quality of life for coffee producers, so fair trade agreements could be used to help other farmers as well.In this example the specific case of fair trade agreements with coffee producers is being used as the starting point for the claim. Because these agreements have worked the author concludes that it could work for other farmers as well.Deductive reasoning begins with a generalization and then applies it to a specific case. The generalization you start with must have been based on a sufficient amount of reliable evidence.Example:Genetically modified seeds have caused poverty, hunger, and a decline in bio-diversity everywhere they have been introduced, so there is no reason the same thing will not occur when genetically modified corn seeds are introduced in Mexico.In this example the author starts with a large claim, that genetically modified seeds have been problematic everywhere, and from this draws the more localized or specific conclusion that Mexico will be affected in the same way.
An example of prejudice caused by inductive reasoning could be assuming that all members of a particular group are lazy because you have observed a few individuals from that group who were not motivated. This generalization based on limited observations can lead to unfair bias and discrimination against the entire group.
An example of prejudice caused by deductive reasoning is the belief that all members of a certain group are untrustworthy based on a few negative encounters with individuals from that group. This generalization ignores the diversity within the group and unfairly taints all its members with the same negative perception due to deductive reasoning.
Angelina caused so much drama; therefore causing her to leave.
A passive sentence says that something happened but doesn't say who caused it to happen. For example: food was eaten. An active sentence says who did it. For example: Tom ate the food.
It caused a REVOLUTION.
It wasn't religious reasoning, it was caused by the error of religious leaders. Recorded in [GENESiS 11:4--7.], Caused by their naming of mankind!
There are many conditions that is not an example of injury caused by overuse. However, carpel tunnel and tendinitis is an example of injuries that are caused by over using the arm and wrist.
If an impact caused the earth to stop rotating it would have already caused damage. For example: If a meteor hit the earth it would crack the earth into pieces, therefore we would be frozen in the darkness for half a year and toasted from the sun the other half.
what happened to the Mississippi river in 1812
some disease caused by Bactria is what happened when you parents made you
A brittle seal ... caused by cold weather.
It happened on the December 8 at San juan capistrano and caused great damage