he would of been poor and would have no money. would of died skinny and hungry at the age of 10.
it wouldve been a lot different
Mark Antony was from a rich plebeian branch of the Antonia clan and therefore must have been a member of the equestrian (cavalryman) order. His mother was a cousin of Julius Caesar. He was a military commander in Julius Caesar's campaign in Gaul. The two men were good friends His political career started with Caesar's support who helped his elections as quaestor, august (a type of priest) and then plebeian tribune.
Caesar was never emperor; he was a dictator. Also, even if he had been an emperor, the age of the monarchy would have been over in Rome.
We do not know whether Caesar wanted to save the republic or, as his assassins thought, wanted to become a king. If the former was the case, it is difficult to assess whether his reforms would have been enough and we do not know whether Caesar would have changed their course because some of them came in the context of protracted civil war. What would have mattered the most, had Caesar not been killed, would have been his charisma and enormous popularity among the Roman people.
Caesar is a title that has been held by many men, each with different numbers of siblings, so this question is not answerable as put. If you are referring to Gaius Julius Caesar, he did not have any brothers. He had a sister, Julia.
Julius Caesar never adopted Augustus. Augustus was Julius's nephew and Augustus had to fight to become the Caesar.Edit: This is false. Augustus was Julius's great nephew as well as his adopted son. Unfortunately, I don't know when he was adopted though.
Julius caesar would probly be another HitlerHe might have been shot instead of stabbed.
Mark Antony was from a rich plebeian branch of the Antonia clan and therefore must have been a member of the equestrian (cavalryman) order. His mother was a cousin of Julius Caesar. He was a military commander in Julius Caesar's campaign in Gaul. The two men were good friends His political career started with Caesar's support who helped his elections as quaestor, august (a type of priest) and then plebeian tribune.
She was the queen of Egypt. I'm not sure if she actually counted as having Roman citizenship, but she certainly would never have been a plebeian. She also was not from a family from the nobility of Rome which made one a patrician.
the emperor Trajan was a patrician. Although his family had been plebeian, the emperor Vespasian made his father a patrician.
Caesar was never emperor; he was a dictator. Also, even if he had been an emperor, the age of the monarchy would have been over in Rome.
In ancient Rome a common person at the beginning of the city would have been a plebeian. As the city grew, a common person would be a member of the proletariat, neither a patrician, plebeian, equite or slave.
actually Octavian would've become leader after Julius Caesar because it was in his secret will. He said that he would appoint Octavian (Augustus Caesar) on the day of his death. Any day that that would be.
Julius Caesar had two sisters and they would both have been named Julia a was the Roman custom.
We do not know whether Caesar wanted to save the republic or, as his assassins thought, wanted to become a king. If the former was the case, it is difficult to assess whether his reforms would have been enough and we do not know whether Caesar would have changed their course because some of them came in the context of protracted civil war. What would have mattered the most, had Caesar not been killed, would have been his charisma and enormous popularity among the Roman people.
Marc Antony never fought Julius Caesar. He was one of Caesar's officers and a relative. Caesar may have been angry with him for a while, but they soon reconciled.Marc Antony never fought Julius Caesar. He was one of Caesar's officers and a relative. Caesar may have been angry with him for a while, but they soon reconciled.Marc Antony never fought Julius Caesar. He was one of Caesar's officers and a relative. Caesar may have been angry with him for a while, but they soon reconciled.Marc Antony never fought Julius Caesar. He was one of Caesar's officers and a relative. Caesar may have been angry with him for a while, but they soon reconciled.Marc Antony never fought Julius Caesar. He was one of Caesar's officers and a relative. Caesar may have been angry with him for a while, but they soon reconciled.Marc Antony never fought Julius Caesar. He was one of Caesar's officers and a relative. Caesar may have been angry with him for a while, but they soon reconciled.Marc Antony never fought Julius Caesar. He was one of Caesar's officers and a relative. Caesar may have been angry with him for a while, but they soon reconciled.Marc Antony never fought Julius Caesar. He was one of Caesar's officers and a relative. Caesar may have been angry with him for a while, but they soon reconciled.Marc Antony never fought Julius Caesar. He was one of Caesar's officers and a relative. Caesar may have been angry with him for a while, but they soon reconciled.
Caesar is a title that has been held by many men, each with different numbers of siblings, so this question is not answerable as put. If you are referring to Gaius Julius Caesar, he did not have any brothers. He had a sister, Julia.
We don't know. We do know that she slept with Caesar and Antony, but there were more than likely others before Caesar as its highly improbable that a 22 years old woman in the ancient world would not have been sexually experienced.We don't know. We do know that she slept with Caesar and Antony, but there were more than likely others before Caesar as its highly improbable that a 22 years old woman in the ancient world would not have been sexually experienced.We don't know. We do know that she slept with Caesar and Antony, but there were more than likely others before Caesar as its highly improbable that a 22 years old woman in the ancient world would not have been sexually experienced.We don't know. We do know that she slept with Caesar and Antony, but there were more than likely others before Caesar as its highly improbable that a 22 years old woman in the ancient world would not have been sexually experienced.We don't know. We do know that she slept with Caesar and Antony, but there were more than likely others before Caesar as its highly improbable that a 22 years old woman in the ancient world would not have been sexually experienced.We don't know. We do know that she slept with Caesar and Antony, but there were more than likely others before Caesar as its highly improbable that a 22 years old woman in the ancient world would not have been sexually experienced.We don't know. We do know that she slept with Caesar and Antony, but there were more than likely others before Caesar as its highly improbable that a 22 years old woman in the ancient world would not have been sexually experienced.We don't know. We do know that she slept with Caesar and Antony, but there were more than likely others before Caesar as its highly improbable that a 22 years old woman in the ancient world would not have been sexually experienced.We don't know. We do know that she slept with Caesar and Antony, but there were more than likely others before Caesar as its highly improbable that a 22 years old woman in the ancient world would not have been sexually experienced.