Want this question answered?
when results from the experiments repeatedly fail to support the hypothesis.
It would become a theory. Then different predictions would need to be made to test other parts of it.
You obtain objective evidence to support it by undertaking experiments designed to test the veracity of the hypothesis.
A better explanation might exist.
A better explanation might exist.
When the evidence in a scientific experiment does not support the hypothesis the scientist:Confirm through repeated experimentation that the evidence is validReject the hypothesisDevelop another hypothesis that is consistent with the valid evidence
when results from the experiments repeatedly fail to support the hypothesis.
a scientist can do another experiment or change their hypothesis.
It would become a theory. Then different predictions would need to be made to test other parts of it.
You obtain objective evidence to support it by undertaking experiments designed to test the veracity of the hypothesis.
The results of his experiments did not support his hypothesis.
Discard or change the hypothesis.
That its wrong (false).
draw conclusions
A better explanation might exist.
A better explanation might exist.
A better explanation might exist.