answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: If Data from repeated experiments do not support the hypothesis what is the scientist next step?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

When the evidence in a scientific experiment does not support the hypothesis what should the scientist do?

When the evidence in a scientific experiment does not support the hypothesis the scientist:Confirm through repeated experimentation that the evidence is validReject the hypothesisDevelop another hypothesis that is consistent with the valid evidence


Why is hypothesis is discarded as a valid hypothesis?

when results from the experiments repeatedly fail to support the hypothesis.


What options does a scientist have if experiment does not support hypothesis?

a scientist can do another experiment or change their hypothesis.


If data from repeated experiments support a hypothesis what would happen next?

It would become a theory. Then different predictions would need to be made to test other parts of it.


How do you support a hypothesis?

You obtain objective evidence to support it by undertaking experiments designed to test the veracity of the hypothesis.


Need a scientific sentence with the word hypothesis?

The results of his experiments did not support his hypothesis.


What do scientist do when their data does not support their hypothesis?

Discard or change the hypothesis.


What conclusion can you draw about a hypothesis if repeated trial do not support the hypothesis?

That its wrong (false).


What can scientists do if the results of an experiments do not support a hypothesis?

draw conclusions


If experiments support a hypothesis why is the hypothesis still considered not proven?

A better explanation might exist.


Why is the hypothesis still not considered proven If experiments support a hypothesis?

A better explanation might exist.


If experiments support a hypothesis why is the hypothesis still not a considered proven?

A better explanation might exist.