But FDR did not know, that is a historical fact. Claims to the contrary are just lies. Michael Montagne
You need evidence to prove he did not know, or to disregard proof that he did know.
"FDR did not know." Is not a historical fact. It is not possible to determine whether he did or didn't, however you can use the weight of the evidence to suggest one way or another."
Again, simply stating that "FDR did not know." without any evidence to support it is NOT A HISTORICAL FACT.
Roosevelt desperately wanted the US to enter the war, he states to William White, a close friend in 1939; "If Germany or Russia win the war or force a peace favourable to them, the situation of your civilization and mine is indeed in peril..."
However he needed the US publics backing. He spent a total of 12 years in office, completed revolutionary new ideas and introduced the first women ever to go to a presidential cabinet. He knew he needed the public support. A crisis like Pearl Harbour unites the nation in an act of revenge and war.
It is more likely however, that the information critically needed to know of the Japanese attack slipped through America's nets. With so much information around, much of it was intercepted. HOWEVER, it is probable that the information was cast out the system as it passed up the ranks, the most important information would go to the most important officer. Much information on Pearl Harbour was found in the 'pending' boxes of interception offices.
Finally, it is impossible to tell if Franklin D Roosevelt knew of the attacks. However we can use the weight of evidence to suggest one way or another.
I believe that America had the POTENTIAL to discover the Japanese attacks, however the poor system of sorting information led to the crucial pieces being discarded. Although a terrible tragedy, the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour worked in Franklin D Roosevelt�s favour.
Pacific war. Pearl Harbor is in Hawaii and Hawaii is in the Pacific. The men who were in the Pacific war had to take back each island from the Japanese and the Philippines. In Manila there was hand to hand fighting. There is a film series called Victory at Sea that has real footage of the Pacific war.
Yes, there were. Most noteworthy were the "Navajo Codetalkers," whos Native American language could not be understood by the Japanese. Richard V. Horrell WW 2 Connections.com
The 3 major theatres of WWII were the European Theatre, the Pacific Theatre and the North-African Theatre.
Gen Douglas MacArthur was associated with the Pacific Theatre during WW2. He was one of the two combatant commanders (Adm Chester Nimitz being the other) determining the strategy and tactics needed to defeat the Japanese.
108,564
The Battle of Midway. In June 1942, the US defeated the Japanese navy and started to push the Japanese back.
Hollywood Pacific Theatre was created in 1928.
During World War II, the early major military strategy in the Pacific theatre was to stop the Japanese from approaching the United States by taking control of the Midway Islands. The European theatre was focusing on Africa to prevent enemy forces from moving northward.
first big success for the US over the Japanese 2. slowing down the Japanese advancement through the pacific, allowing the US forces to resupply and increase their presence in the Pacific theatre
I would assume a few would end up in the Pacific theatre since Japan & Germany were allies.
During World War II, the early major military strategy in the Pacific theatre was to stop the Japanese from approaching the United States by taking control of the Midway Islands. The European theatre was focusing on Africa to prevent enemy forces from moving northward.
WW2 used the famous Hellcat and its predecessor the Wildcat. Both were famous in carrier actions against the Japanese in the Pacific theatre.
Pacific war. Pearl Harbor is in Hawaii and Hawaii is in the Pacific. The men who were in the Pacific war had to take back each island from the Japanese and the Philippines. In Manila there was hand to hand fighting. There is a film series called Victory at Sea that has real footage of the Pacific war.
you have asked an unaskable question. modern theatre is now. and only past things can influence. so therefore modern theatre cannont have had any influence on japanese theatre whatsoever!
There is 'Noh' theatre.
A Japanese puppet theatre.
There are several types of Japanese theatre/performance art, but two famous forms are Noh and Kabuki theatre. Written in Japanese, they are: 能  歌舞伎