0
What else can I help you with?
What was Galileo's objection to using the bible to study physical natural phenomena?
The Bible isn't science and may or may not be true. Galileo needed to have to experiment with real science and find out if his theory was correct.
Is there a Bible verse to support the statement that Mary was not Jesus' mother?
No. the Bible states that Jesus was his mother and nowhere contradicts this..
If science contradicts with the Bible then Science is wrong Agree or Disagree?
Depends upon whether one believes in the scientific creation or the biblical creation. No definitive answer can be achieved as to who is right or wrong. It also depends whether you believe in a naturalistic philosophy behind the science or whether you will interpret the facts according to pure science without such philosophy. Scientific facts do not speak for themselves nor can science make conclusions about something such as the Bible which is not a scientific document (this makes no statement about whether the Bible is true or not). If science is made to contradict the Bible then it has ceased to be science but is a philosophy. Science, as such does not and cannot contradict the Bible. Separate answer: Occasionally Science and the Bible do differ, but you can see that the Bible agrees with modern Science on several interesting points! Such as Job 26:7 Which says "...the Earth which is hanging upon nothing..." this was back when people believed the Earth was on the back of a giant animal, or some type of mythological "god". (Also see Isaiah 40:22 "...circle of the Earth...") So it's plain to see that the Bible is the inspired word of God, and if something in science contradicts the Bible, I believe the Bible would always be in the right. For more information you can go to www.watchtower.org ^^ The bible rarely is in line with science. There are several ways in which it is flat out wrong.. Let's list some examples, shall we? 1.) The age of the earth 2.) Evolution 3.) The animal food chain 4.) The diets of certain animals. 5.) Mathematics 6.) Weather 7.) Whether animals can talk or not 8.) The existence of mud people 9.) Virgin birth 10.) Zombies 11.) The heliocentric universe 12.) Dinosaurs etc
What caused disunity in matter of Christian doctrine and philosophy?
With regard to evolution, it is generally the interpretation of Genesis as a literal, scientific document. People with a dogmatic view of The Bible are often very hostile toward science, as they believe that anything that contradicts their understanding of the Bible must be false, even if it has been proven scientifically. Having said that, I have nothing against fundamentalists.
What biblical writings attributed to King Solomon are not included in the Bible or Torah?
The question contradicts itself. If it isn't in the Bible, it isn't "biblical writings."
What is the problem that bible believing people have with the geological column?
Bible-believing individuals often view the geological column as conflicting with a literal interpretation of the Bible, particularly the creation accounts in Genesis. They may argue that the age of the Earth suggested by the geological column contradicts a young Earth perspective based on biblical timelines. Additionally, some believe that the fossil record implies a gradual evolution of life that contradicts their interpretation of divine creation. This tension stems from differing views on the relationship between science and scripture.
Are science and the Bible against each other?
yes proabley but im not sure.Definitely not for a number of good reasons.Firstly, science rightly understood has nothing to say which contradicts the Bible. Efforts to make it do so demonstrates a philosophical bias towards the idea of naturalism which is not science but philosophy.Secondly, the Bible is essentially a book of religion and not science and so the two don't overlap that much. However, where the Bible speaks on matters which relate to science there is nothing proven from science which contradicts the Bible. Much is said to do so, but there is also much that clearly doesn't but in fact supports the Bible. There is no need to ignore the facts which support the Bible and to interpret discoveries in order to discredit the Bible. This is not science.Thirdly, modern science is based on and was started by many scientists who believed the Bible, people like Keppler and Newton for example. Both their discoveries and their methods are based on Christian presuppositions including the existence of an orderly world created by a God of order, the laws and details of which God gave us the ability to discern and discover and harness.Fourthly, it is not sufficient to endeavor to downgrade the Bible to purely a book about religion which has nothing relevant to say about scientific matters. For while the Bible is essentially a book about religion it also claims knowledge about many matters of significance scientifically, although it does not go into the detail of a modern scientific work. The idea that God created the earth and the universe in 6 days around 6,000 years ago has much support from scientific evidence but does not depend on fallible and changing opinions of science.Summary:There is thus no need to see that science and the Bible are in opposition. This is not a logical necessity from the facts of science (versus interpretations based on naturalistic philosophy).
What is 10 things that's science and not science?
all about technology is Science but the things the Bible mentions are not Science. Science is different to a Bible. Science is made by a person but the Bible is only wrote by a man but God made it.
How do you spell hippocritical?
The correct spelling is "hypocritical." It means behaving in a way that contradicts what one claims to believe or feel.
Why does the pope sometimes contradict what the Bible says?
The pope never contradicts the Bible. He may contradict what certain groups, particularly Protestants, THINK the Bible says. The Magisterium of the Church has the final say as to how Catholics should interpret the Bible.
Who is the author of the Bible quran and science?
The Bible is God; the Koran is Muhammed; and Science is mankind.
Where in the Bible is in the last days women will become men?
It isn't in the Bible. It is one of the books that call themselves the gospel-of-something-or-the-other but was written much later and contradicts the rest of the Bible, proving that is isn't part of it.
