i think you should record the results.
An experiment is performed to generate more data. If the data proves to not support the hypothesis the experiment was still useful. You could reproduce your experiment to see if it is performing the way it should. After you have confirmed the experiment is performing correctly you then could devise another experiment to further test your hypothesis or accept the result and revise your hypothesis.
If water is not still before an experiment then if the experiment involves measuring water then the measurement would not be accurate. Also if there is something in the water you might spill it out and spoil your experiment.
He should relax, try not to hover over the apparatus or worry about the results, and try to manage his stress and conserve his energy, perhaps by having a warm drink or some light refreshments, reading the newspaper, going to a movie, singing a song, or taking a nap. That way, when the experiment has finished conducting, he will still be fresh and alert enough to record the data accurately, and interpret it correctly.
If after multiple trials you still get the same data or information
A valid one. An experiment cannot conclusively prove anything if more than one independent variable is altered at a time. That being said, many dependent variables could show change and the experiment would still be valid, as long as only one independent variable was altered at a time. An experiment that changes only one variable at a time is called a controlled experiment.
No. It should have been recorded while the parties all still owned the respective properties.No. It should have been recorded while the parties all still owned the respective properties.No. It should have been recorded while the parties all still owned the respective properties.No. It should have been recorded while the parties all still owned the respective properties.
The word you're probably looking for is "confirmation". Technically, the result of an experiment is always "true", in that it represents what really happened. This may or may not be what you expected to happen. and there may be factors you're unaware of, but still, the result is truly what did happen.
This depends on the type of fish; they may swim slower, but should still swim as expected
An experiment is performed to generate more data. If the data proves to not support the hypothesis the experiment was still useful. You could reproduce your experiment to see if it is performing the way it should. After you have confirmed the experiment is performing correctly you then could devise another experiment to further test your hypothesis or accept the result and revise your hypothesis.
An extinct volcano that has not erupted for at least 10,000 years and is not expected to erupt again. A dormant volcano may have erupted several thousand years or more before and is not expected to erupt again, but it still has a magma supply.
Well in the case that it does have a variable, even just one, it would still be a variable experiment because that one part of the experiment may still cause a different effect/result when changed!!!
If you want to get the answer, you should do the experiment instead of going on Google to find the answer!
Well in the case that it does have a variable, even just one, it would still be a variable experiment because that one part of the experiment may still cause a different effect/result when changed!!!
perform an experiment that attempts to identify the gas above the open beaker
If water is not still before an experiment then if the experiment involves measuring water then the measurement would not be accurate. Also if there is something in the water you might spill it out and spoil your experiment.
Yes, the will can still go into probate. The distribution should be recorded in the books of the estate.
Yes, although if the experiment is performed correctly there should be relatively little chance of this occurring. This is referred to as a type II error in statistics - the data supports rejecting the hypothesis even though the hypothesis is correct.