Stare decisis is the legal principle under which judges are obligated to follow the precedents established in prior decisions.
stare decisis
A judge must be a person of high principle. perfect
YES, if the judge knw someone in the military...but i think it is best to apply rather than relying on others... :D
The political views of a judge doesn't determine the decisions that they make. A judge is not asked what political party they belong to and decisions are based on law not political views.
adjudication
judge.
A judge should not as his own charges can impach his decisions in cases.Ordinarily if he is not a judge he would be interdicted or suspended until the decision is made known
In a jury trial, the jury makes decisions of fact, and the judge makes decisions on the law. Neither has any input on the others' decisions.
there are 4 principles. You have to learn them all.
a judge who shares a president's views when first appointed may change views when making decisions on the bench? why?
Judgment may be
precedent
The referee that stands in the middle of the field is the referee who is the final authority for that game. All decisions made by this referee are final, regardless of what is done or said by any other player, coach, spectator, or assistant referee. Generally, this position is referred to as the "center referee," or some other similar nomenclature. I have heard "head referee," "center official," "middle referee," or "the dude in the center of the field."