The answer depends upon the stage at which it was "dropped," and if it was dropped by a court, whether it was done with or without "prejudice." It can also depend upon the statute of limitations.
Here's an example: Bill beat his wife. The police are called and Bill is arrested. In olden days, the wife would be asked whether she wanted to "press charges." If she said no, there would be no further steps taken in the criminal justice system. If that's what you're referring to, yes, assault charges could be brought (in criminal cases, it's never the victim "pressing charges." Only the government can do that. So, if the statute of limitations for assault has not run out, then it is possible that a prosecutor could file criminal charges.
In any case where criminal charges have been filed and "Bill" has been summoned to court, if the judge drops the charges, she'll do it in one of two ways:either with or without prejudice. If a case is dropped without prejudice, then the charges can be refiled within the statute of limitations. If the case is dropped with prejudice, then the charges cannot be brought again (absent the judge's decision being overturned by a higher court.)
Also, once a jury panel is sworn in to start the selection process "jeopardy" has attached and the charges cannot be re-brought by the same government agency. Double jeopardy does not prevent the Federal government from charging you (say with bank robbery) even if you're acquitted in State Court. Same goes with Tribal nations - as long as these other sovereign governments have jurisdiction too.
Once a crime has been charged, it is not up to the complaining victim whether to drop any of the charges-- it is entirely up to the prosecutor. Once the complaint is officially filed, the complainant has no control over what happens to the charges.
Yes, charges are 'dropped' by the authority of the prosecutor's office, and they can be re-instituted if circumstances change. The only way a defendant cannot be re-charged is if the judge dismisses the charge WITH PREJUDICE.
Yes, this is what usually happens when an investigation turns up evidence that excuses one suspect and implicates another.
Visa governor is not true. They r there ONLY TO EXTRACT POSTAL CHRGES FOR THE documents which they never send.
the main reason that roman capital punishment was used was to deter people from comitting crimes. hope this helps.
In the U.S. you don't; it's against the law to charge people to vote.
They can have a criminal charge brought against them.
Of course, relationships are all about compromise and people can always change. It does add a strain to the relationship when there are differences though, so you'd have to consider that before comitting.
people who were in charge of the missions
The point of democracy is that the people are in charge
Laws exist against police brutality. Either police are brutal or they are not brutal. If they are found guilty of violating a persons civil rights in a court of law, a judge may choose to add time to a jail or prison sentence for a particular reason. Still, while that reason could be a part of the original charge, it would not be the reason for the original charge against the policeman.
we have no clue u stupid people!!!!
You can charge people $5.00 for old CDs and books that you no longer need.
The first charge brought against Christ in the Sanhedrin was sedition. For people heard him say; "We heard him say, I will destroy this temple that is made with hands, and within three days I will build another without hands." (Mark 14:58) The next accusations were blasphemy and treason. God bless! (Do you know Christ?)
why many people are against DRM