answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Yup.

You're right to note, that the speed of belt is matching the takeoff speed (some trolls forget about speed being relative). So the plane will take off, with it's wheels on the belt spinning twice as usual.

((Yes. The logical error that "catches" many people is that they are more familiar with cars than planes. A car exerts its forward force on the ground, like a person does. When you put them on a treadmill travelling backward at the same speed that the object is attempting to move forward, then they are attempting to move against an equally moving medium. This results in a Red Queen scenario and a stationary object.

A plane however, does not move forward using its wheels. They are freespinning objects independent of the propulsion system. A plane is exerting its forward force against the AIR, and therefore will move with respect to the air. A plane attempting to lift off on a conveyor belt (no matter the speed of the belt) will do so essentially just as easily as it would had it been running on a standard runway.

Mathmatically, this can be expressed by the fact that stationary objects are stationary because the forces are equal on all sides. A pencil resting on a table is exerting its force (as its weight) against the table, and the table is pressing back with equal force. When an object is moving on a surface (like a car or a grounded plane), frictional force is applied to the object resisting the forward motion. To calcuate the magnitude of this resisting force, you must multiply the normal force (the weight of the object), by the coefficient in friction (the calcuated "roughness" of the surface).

This leaves no variable for the speed of the surface below it to apply in order to counteract the thrusting force caused by the pushing of the air. This resisting force for the plane will remain essentially the same regardless if it is on a standard runway, a belt moving at 25 mph, or a belt moving at mach 3. As long as the wheels remain intact, the plane will take off. The only physical difference that the plane will experience in this scenario is that the wheels will move twice as fast. Half of the speed are caused by forces that are driving the plane forward, and the other half of the speed are caused by the conveyor belt moving backward.

A simple experiment that can prove this is demostrated on YouTube at the following link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4owlyCOzDiE

It clearly demostrates that the speed of the belt has no bearing on the aircraft's ability to move. Once the craft overcomes the frictional force that would be present even with a stationary runway, no more force is needed, even as the author of the video ramps up the speed of the treadmill by several factors without compensating with the thrust.

Ergo a conveyor belt, matching the plane's speed or not, is completely impotent to hinder the aircraft's ability to take off.))

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: If a plane is traveling at takeoff speed on a conveyor belt and the belt is matching that speed in the opposite direction can the plane take off?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Physics

What does the velocity of car A which is traveling at 50 ms West appear to be from your frame of reference?

Depends entirely on your frame of reference! If you are in a car traveling along side it at 50 ms, the car will appear to be standing still. If you are going the opposite direction at 50 ms, it will appear to be traveling at 100ms.


How do you work out the deceleration?

Same as acceleration - just remember that "deceleration" is an acceleration in a direction opposite to the direction of movement.Same as acceleration - just remember that "deceleration" is an acceleration in a direction opposite to the direction of movement.Same as acceleration - just remember that "deceleration" is an acceleration in a direction opposite to the direction of movement.Same as acceleration - just remember that "deceleration" is an acceleration in a direction opposite to the direction of movement.


What does it mean when the change in velocity is negative?

It means deceleration or slowing down and there is a force operating against the motion.


What is the opposite of changing direction?

The opposite of changing directions would be maintaining a course, or continuing in the same direction.


A particle traveling through space is being accelerated by a 100 N force All of a sudden the particle encounters a second force of 100 N in the opposite direction of the first force With both force?

Your question makes no sense, so I will tell you what will happen. The two equal and opposing forces will cancel each other out, and the particle will continue traveling at the speed it was when the second force was applied in the same direction that it was already traveling.

Related questions

Do white lines separate traffic traveling in opposite direction?

yes


White lines separate traffic traveling in opposite directions?

yes


What happens if Something is traveling at constant deceleration?

It slows to a rest and then starts moving in the opposite direction at constant acceleration in that direction.


How does the force of friction act relative to an object in motion?

It will USUALLY pull the object backwards, in relation to the direction of the motion. This assumes that the material with which it has friction, moves slower than the object you are considering. However, if you put material on a conveyor belt, the force of friction, of the object with the conveyor belt, will pull it FORWARD until the object has the same speed as the conveyor belt.


Is it true or false that White lines separated traffic traveling in opposite direction?

That is false. At least in America. Solid yellow lines are the means to separate traffic traveling in an opposite direction. A solid white line marks the outside edge of your lane, or the outside edge of the lane traveling in your direction. Meaning you'll either go into the shoulder, or off the road entirely, if you go over the solid white line.


Are vehicles traveling in the opposite direction of school buses that have stopped to unload children on divided highway with a dividing barrier required to stop?

No


Are vehicles traveling in the opposite direction of school buses that have stopped to unload children on a divided highway with dividing barrier required to stop?

No.


Are vehicles traveling in the opposite direction of school buses that have stopped to unload children a divided highway with a dividing barrier required to stop?

yes


If a car is traveling eastward can its acceleration be westward?

Yes. If you are traveling eastward but slowing down, your acceleration would be westward.


Are vehicles traveling in the opposite direction of school buses that have stopped to unload children on a divided highway with dividing barrier required to stop in the state of Florida?

No.


Do Two cars traveling the same speed in opposite directions have the same velocity?

No, because velocity includes direction as well as speed.In order for the velocities to be the same, they would have to go the same speed in the same direction.


Are vehicles traveling in the opposite direction of school buses that have stopped to unload children on a divided highway with a dividing barrier required to stop in florida?

As the question is worded - no, they do not.