Not necessarily. An argument is not automatically true just because the premise and conclusion are true. The reasoning connecting the premise to the conclusion must also be valid for the argument to be considered true.
Yes, arguments can move from a specific premise to a specific conclusion, which is known as a deductive argument. They can also move from a general premise to a general conclusion, which is known as an inductive argument. The structure and validity of the argument depend on the relationship between the premise and conclusion.
True. If a premise supports a conclusion on its own, it also supports that conclusion independently because the validity of the conclusion is not dependent on any other premises in the argument. Each premise functions as a standalone reason supporting the conclusion.
A deductive argument is a logical reasoning process where the conclusion necessarily follows from the premise. If the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. It is a form of reasoning that aims to provide logically conclusive evidence for the conclusion.
True. A valid argument can have a false conclusion if the premises logically lead to that conclusion even though it is not true. Validity in logic refers to the structure of the argument, regardless of the truth or falsity of the premises or conclusion.
A deductive argument consists of a premise (a statement assumed to be true) and a conclusion (a statement inferred from the premises). The premise provides evidence or reasons to support the conclusion, which must necessarily follow from the premises if they are true. Deductive arguments aim to demonstrate the logical necessity of the conclusion based on the premises provided.
Yes, arguments can move from a specific premise to a specific conclusion, which is known as a deductive argument. They can also move from a general premise to a general conclusion, which is known as an inductive argument. The structure and validity of the argument depend on the relationship between the premise and conclusion.
True. If a premise supports a conclusion on its own, it also supports that conclusion independently because the validity of the conclusion is not dependent on any other premises in the argument. Each premise functions as a standalone reason supporting the conclusion.
A deductive argument is a logical reasoning process where the conclusion necessarily follows from the premise. If the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. It is a form of reasoning that aims to provide logically conclusive evidence for the conclusion.
A valid deductive argument will have a valid premise and conclusion and a fallacy may be true, it all matters on how you came to the conclusion.
True. A valid argument can have a false conclusion if the premises logically lead to that conclusion even though it is not true. Validity in logic refers to the structure of the argument, regardless of the truth or falsity of the premises or conclusion.
A deductive argument consists of a premise (a statement assumed to be true) and a conclusion (a statement inferred from the premises). The premise provides evidence or reasons to support the conclusion, which must necessarily follow from the premises if they are true. Deductive arguments aim to demonstrate the logical necessity of the conclusion based on the premises provided.
An argument with a missing premise or conclusion is called an enthymeme. It is an incomplete syllogism in which one of the premises or the conclusion is left unstated.
syllogism
The two parts of a logical argument are the premise (or premises) and the conclusion. The premise is the part of an argument that visibly have evidence or logical steps to reach a conclusion. A conclusion is the result of the reasoning in the premise.
Good deductive argument
A premise in an argument is a statement or proposition that serves as the basis for the conclusion of the argument. It is presented as a reason or evidence to support the conclusion that the arguer is trying to establish. Premises are essential in constructing sound and valid arguments.
In an argument used for an explanation, the two kinds of premises are the explanatory premise, which provides the reason for the conclusion, and the auxiliary premise, which provides additional support or context for the explanation. The explanatory premise explains why the conclusion is true, while the auxiliary premise provides supplementary information to enhance the explanation.