You can see it if the case was yours and you paid the lawyer. Otherwise, it must be subpoenaed in a separate action.
I have seen no documentation that disallows a father from representing any relative in a Federal court case.
Actually, states vary with how this is legislated and some are not mandated to follow any protocol at all. In Florida beginning 01.01.2006 all attorneys are mandated to appoint an "Inventory" attorney if there are not partners to take over their caseload. If your case has been "closed" and you haven't seen your attorney for a while, (FL doesn't really specify a time-frame in it's statutes) then your file(s) can be destroyed. If your case is "open" then it is incumbent upon the Inventory attorney to find another lawyer to take your case or you may choose. Funny thing, they are not mandated to write down the files they destroy. Mine were destroyed prior to me finding out that my attorney had died 2 years earlier. The Inventory attorney said he didn't recognize my name...big surprise. I needed information from my file but had no recourse. This law should be changed to make attorney's be more responsible and at least make a LIST of what files the attorney had (by name) when they died and when/where and whom destroyed them. Good question to ask before you hire an attorney...what happens to my file(s) if and when you die? Check with your state's bar association and they will be able to inform you if there are any laws regarding this in your state. Alot of the documents attorney's prepare are filed with your clerk at the court house or they are filed wherever the motion was heard or happened. Hope this helps.
No, seen is the past participle. The simple past tense is saw.
Seen is the past participle of see See- saw- seen
Seen in is not tense. The verb seen is the past participle of see but a past participle by itself does not make a tense.have/has seen = present perfecthad seen = past perfectwas seen = passive
Yes, "seen" is the past participle form of the verb "see." It is commonly used in perfect tenses, passive voice, and as an adjective.
"Seen" is already the past participle of "see", and the past tense of "see" is "saw".
has seen - is present perfect (third person) - he/she/ the doctor has seen had seen - is past perfect (all persons) - he/ she / the doctor / we / they had seen. has seen - present perfect is used to talk about something that happened in the past and is related some way to now. eg He has seen the movie before. had seen - past perfect is used to talk about something that happened in the past before another thing (usually past simple) that happened in the past. eg He had seen the movie when he went to Hamilton.
'Had seen' is the past perfect tense.The present perfect tense would be 'have/has seen'.
Yes. If the visitation order is not being followed you should file a motion for contempt. You should ask if there is a legal advocate at the court who could advise you. If not then you should consult with an attorney.
I saw you yesterday. (past tense of to see)The verb seen is the past participle of to see, and uses a helping verb.(I might have seen you yesterday, I could have seen you yesterday)see - present, saw - past, seen - past participle.The past participle is used in present perfect sentences:I have seen the movie three times now.Or past perfect sentences:I had seen the movie before.And other tenses.
The phrase "is you seen" is not proper English grammar. It appears to be a grammatical error, as "is" is the present tense form of the verb "to be" and "seen" is the past participle form of "see." A correct phrasing could be "have you seen?" or "did you see?" depending on the context.