answersLogoWhite

0

Unless you are backing up, a rear-end collision is almost always the fault of the person who hits you from behind.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Who is at fault when the car behind you hits another car thinking that you are going to hit them as you reverse Incidentally I did not hit their car?

It is their fault.


Are you at fault if you hit someone from behind who stopped in the middle of the street and the started to back up?

If they wern't going backwards when you hit them you are at fault.


If your car broke down on the highway and you got hit from behind by a truck who is at fault?

Well it's his fault cause he should have been watching were he was going.


Who is at fault if you hit the car behind you when you return to your lane after going around a car that was pulled over?

If you changed lanes and hit a car in the lane you are trying to get into you are at fault.


What is going on when the blinkers all of them quit working but the emergency flashers work for a 1992 Toyota pickup?

you need to replace blinker can in your vehicle. the flashers and blinkers have separate flasher cans which is why your flashers still work but not your blinkers


Who is at fault when a car brakes suddenly and you are going 30 mph?

Anyone who hits someone from behind is at fault. Even though it may seem like the driver in front shouldn't have done what they did.


Where is the flasher located on a 03 ford windstar lx?

Ford kinda hid the flashers. Look behind the steering wheel. It's that little button that's on the column going into the dash. Can't miss it


You breaked suddenly and the car behind you went into the back of your car whos at fault?

Normally the car that hit the other car is going to be at fault. The vehicle behind you was obviously too close and was not following at a safe distance that would allow him to stop if you did. The police should have issued him a ticket.


Someone is backing out of a parking spot and they hit youwho is at fault?

If this is a simple case of one driver backing into the car directly behind it, then the moving driver is at fault. That driver would be at fault even if the car that gets hit is illegally parked or parked to closely behind the moving driver. A moving driver is supposed to watch where he is going to make sure the way is clear and it is safe to proceed. If he moves without first making sure all is clear, then he is negligent because he is not allowed to plow into another car just because it shouldn't be there. Drivers are not allowed to run down jay-walkers just because it is illegal to cross at that spot (no matter how annoying that is). On the other hand if this is an accident where both cars are in motion then it is possible for the other driver to be at fault or both could be at fault.


Who's at fault if there's a 7 car pile up on freeway due to someone changing tire in the left lane you were last car and hit car in front of you but they hit car in front of them first?

If you hit a car from behind, you are going to be held to be at fault. If a car hits you from behind, they are going to be held at fault. Most jurisdictions consider hitting the back of a car prima facia evidence that you were following too closely. You could literally have six cars at fault in this case, each one for hitting the one in front of it.


1997 accord special edition the flashers work but the blinkers do not why is that?

Most likely, it's going to be because the actual switch on the column is bad. If neither were working I would say it's the relay, but since the flashers still work, I'm going to say it's the switch itself.


If you stop at a stop sign behind someone and they pull out and you've been waiting and it's clear do you still have to stop again before going?

Yes, you do.