Want this question answered?
I didn't check the year... But the cosmic background radiation is said to support the big bang theory, because it agrees with the radiation that is expected from an expanding Universe.
1) Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation 2) The universe is very quickly expanding
It is not so much that the universe is expanding, but rather the rationalization for its expansion that provides evidence to support the Big Bang Theory. The Big Bang supports interpreted observational evidence of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) barrier that there is an evolutionary expansion of the universe which promotes a finite age for the universe.
The Big Bang supports interpreted observational evidence of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) barrier that the universe is Time bound (or has a finite existence), that the universe is expanding (within the dimensional limits of Space and Time), that the universe is evolving a set amount of matter and energy while it is expanding over time, and that the universe is homogeneous and isotropic with respect to Space and Time.
expansion of the universe as shown by the Hubble constant3K universal microwave background radiationetc.
I didn't check the year... But the cosmic background radiation is said to support the big bang theory, because it agrees with the radiation that is expected from an expanding Universe.
1) Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation 2) The universe is very quickly expanding
It is not so much that the universe is expanding, but rather the rationalization for its expansion that provides evidence to support the Big Bang Theory. The Big Bang supports interpreted observational evidence of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) barrier that there is an evolutionary expansion of the universe which promotes a finite age for the universe.
It is not so much that the universe is expanding, but rather the rationalization for its expansion that provides evidence to support the Big Bang Theory. The Big Bang supports interpreted observational evidence of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) barrier that there is an evolutionary expansion of the universe which promotes a finite age for the universe.
Mainly, the redshift of distant galaxies, which indicates that they are moving away from us. Also:* Calculations, to the effect that the Universe can't be static. * The microwave background radiation, which agrees closely with the theory. * The percentage of elements (and isotopes) in the Universe, which also closely agrees with the theory.
The Big Bang supports interpreted observational evidence of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) barrier that the universe is Time bound (or has a finite existence), that the universe is expanding (within the dimensional limits of Space and Time), that the universe is evolving a set amount of matter and energy while it is expanding over time, and that the universe is homogeneous and isotropic with respect to Space and Time.
expansion of the universe as shown by the Hubble constant3K universal microwave background radiationetc.
I would argue no. There is no scientific evidence to support one opinion or another. However, I would not recommed standing nearby or looking into a microwave on a consistent basis due to the radiation.
The first concept is that of the redshift, which is the observation that light from distant galaxies appears to be shifted towards longer wavelengths. This indicates that these galaxies are moving away from us. The second concept is the cosmic microwave background radiation, which is a faint radiation that is present throughout the universe and is thought to be leftover electromagnetic radiation from the early stages of the universe. Together, these concepts support the idea that the universe is expanding.
Big Bang Cosmology predicted the existence, isotropy, and spectrum of the CBR; all other hypotheses have no explanation for it. When one idea perfectly explains an undeniable fact of our Universe, and another utterly fails to do so; scientists tend to prefer the former idea.
either starlight spectra or moving galaxies.
Some of the mathematical models of what a "big bang" might cause, in long-term aftereffects, would be a background microwave radiation that might be an "echo of creation". The temperature or frequency of the background radiation would, in this model, indicate the age of the universe. At about the same time that this model was being developed, two researchers from Bell Labs were trying to figure out the source of a background microwave radiation that was causing noise and static in the Bell System's long-distance microwave transmission systems. it was sort of like the old TV commercials where the chocolate truck runs into the peanut butter van, and they discover Reese's Peanut Butter Cups. When they got together, there was a Nobel Prize in it.