Skills are only a fraction of the person. I would consider the job requirements; physical and mental, the attitude of the prospective employee, and first impression of the two individuals.
Gender is irrelevant when selecting suitable people for the job. There must be some difference in skills and suitability between your two candidates, and if you cannot find one, interview them again.
Its absolutely fine if both the sexes have equally good skill set for a company, but they have a different temperament of handling situations! The one whose good enough to do time, human management better is eligible to be selected for the respective position in the company!
This is actually a really good question. I work in a mostly male dominated trade. Roughly only 4% of my trade is women. It's not about gender. It's about the over all package. Being a woman in a trade that is dominated by sometimes rough, gruff, sarcastic, rude, crude, insecure, nasty, sometimes you have to hire the person that is not just fit for the trade but going on the same path as the company it's asking to work for. If you are totally qualified to do a job.... that doesn't mean you are the person for the job. Sometimes it's just not a good fit. I would have to say in a situation like this I would start to dig into character, what they have to offer the company besides their skill. Anyone can come in and do some mundane job, but it takes that extra somebody to come in everyday and show up with that edge and make it a different.
It does not matter what sex they are, but by the skils they need to accomplish the job you are giving. If they have equal skills, it all comes down on how well their personal skills are. for example: the might have all of the reqiremnts for your job, but are they easy to talk to and a good representative of your company? Ex. They can help you with all of your marketing and planning, but when it comes to presenting your product they are worthless, it is better to go with the other intern.
If you would like to see a perfect, easy example of this, watch the movie RV. It has Robin Williams in it. In the end it shows how one of the employees write great presentations, but is horrible at presenting them. I think you should watch this movie to get a better Jist of what i am trying to explain to you.
Good Luck, I hope you make the right choice! :)
it is when four people are equally committed to each other.
In the context of education, R.O.P.E.S stands for: Respect Other People Equally Siempre Therefore, I would say EQUALLY is the answer.
If you are seriously involved, then you probably won't decide to see other people. It depends on what the two of you decide is okay...
When you are in a stable relationship and happy, then you can decide to move to the other stage, which is marriage.
People should be treated equally in all aspects of life, regardless of their race, religion, gender, or any other characteristic. Equality should be upheld in areas such as education, employment, healthcare, and basic human rights. Treating people equally ensures a fair and just society where everyone has the same opportunities and rights.
As a rule people who migrates from Russia, that`s people who can not find occupational work ( or work on their profession) such as engineers, programmers and other highly skilled professionals who are not in demand in Russia. People who want a dignified and secure life for themselves and their children. People who want to achieve something in life and believe in a brighter future. Basically - it's skilled or highly skilled specialists.
Skilled migrants are people migrating, or moving, to another country who come educated or trained in specific areas. This can include nurses, lawyers, engineers, scientists and many other occupations.
Its called choosing the lesser of two evils. Both choices are bad but one has to be better than the other.
Scribes are people that write things for other people. In ancient Egypt scribes were very skilled people. It took twelve years to become a scribe.
A Diplomat, as in trained, or skilled, in the use of diplomacy
"When Greek met Greek" is a phrase that refers to a situation in which two equally matched or skilled opponents or competitors face each other. It suggests a clash or confrontation between powerful and knowledgeable individuals or groups.
The attack on the 9/11 against the World Trade Center and other major government offices and airplanes brought the US citizens together. There were people of all races, gender and age that were being helped from strangers and people they knew. Everyone received care and assistance equally.