We can extend LAN by using repeaters. If we increase LAN by using large number of repeaters than this arrangement does not guarantees sufficient signal strength. Each repeater and segment along the path increases the delay. If the delay becomes too large scheme fails. In fact, repeaters are part of the Ethernet standard, which specifies that the network will not operate correctly if more than four repeaters separate any pair of stations. i. If we can extend the LAN then why we need a WAN? ii. How can a bridge know whether to forward frames? iii. Can the length of an Ethernet be increased to many segments of 500 meter each merely by adding a repeater to connect each additional segment? iv. How can a computer attach to a network that sends and receives bits faster than the computer's CPU can handle them?
From the user's point of view, accessing a LAN or WAN is the same. If packets need to be forwarded from a LAN via a WAN connection that is taken care of automatically by the router.
WAN. LAN is a short range connection, WAN is wide range.
absolutely wan. lan is used for a office or a building complex
An LAN card is a must if you wish to connect to a LAN but it is not required for WAN
LAN users get access to internet or can communicate with others LAN connected to WAN.
WAN requires the same technology as LAN.
Extranet is wan
WAN
if the LAN is connected to another LAN over a wide distance using point to point links then it becomes part of the WAN (but it doesn't become a WAN by itself).
why the lan high speed than wan
wan wireless right?
ATM protocol is a WAN technology