Yes, this would be common and appropriate.
I would think that if the person doing the assualting got killed, and he was the cause of the accident (by assaulting the driver, and thus possibly causing the seizure), that there would be no indication of vehicular homicide, unless the driver was already stated that he/she was unable to drive due to seizures.
A person can only be charged with one type of homicide for each person who was killed. If a pregnant woman was killed and the fetus was at least half term, then there are two homicides with which a person can be charged. Vehicular homicide is typically a less serious offense than murder. If evidence exists that the driver purposely ran over an individual with the intent to kill him, and did kill him, the driver can be charged with murder.
James McNair, whose stage name was Jimmy Mack, was the friend of Tracy Morgan who was killed in the accident. A truck driver named Kevin Roper has been charged with assault by auto and vehicular homicide.
If someone in a vehicle accident is injured or killed, one or all of the drivers involved in the accident may be charged with vehicular manslaughter or felon reckless or drunken driving, depending on the circumstances. The driver charged does not necessarily have to be the one who caused the accident.
The driver would most certrainly be charged with, at the very least, mansalughter or Vehicular Homicide.
The description HOMICIDE, indicates that it was probably a criminal act, as opposed to an 'accidental' act which would be charged as MANSLAUGHTER. Therefore the penalty would be the same as if the victim was killed by means of any other weapon.
The drunk driver who caused the accident would be the person held responsible for any deaths-including a passenger. The crime is called vehicular homicide and a civil wrongful death case could also be brought against the drunk driver additionally. The article below goes into more detail on vehicular manslaughter.
You would have broken more than one law. You would be charged with vehicular manslaughter, among many other possible charges.
They would be charged with Homicide. It is THEIR actions that are criminal act, not YOUR intent.
Any crash while intoxicated is not classified by drug, it just says that it is an intoxicated vehicular accident. So to answer your question, we simply do not know.
assuming the device detonates ( if that is the word) as the result of an automobile accident, it would be at worst involuntary homicide, certainly not murder as it was the result of an accident. it is a sad fact that while society has largely gotten over the idea of (Punishing) diseases, a criminal-procedure attitude and in effect legal stance persists with accidents, particularily when they take human life. let us face it, an accident, like the crane collapses last year in NY is not a deliberate malicious act- though some auto mishaps have been deliberate vehicular homicides- this is quite rare, running down someone , for example.
Not unless he A.) killed the people then stuck them in the back then crashed B.) Purposely hit them. If it was an accident he would charged with manslaughter.