A recording in which the abuser admits guilt should at least be enough to open an investigation. However, some states have laws against "wire tapping"--recording someone without their knowledge on the telephone or in person. Take your recording to a lawyer and ask him to determine what you should or can do.
Allegations of witchcraft were real enough in the middle ages. In Henry VI Parts 1 and 2 two different women are accused of witchcraft, including Joan of Arc, who was indeed accused of witchcraft and burned at the stake. Shakespeare was only reflecting the truths of history.
Although he accused me for stealing his phone, we had enough witnesses and evidence to say I'm not.
When allegations are not sustained, it means that the evidence did not support the claim or accusation. Essentially, it indicates that there was not enough evidence to prove or disprove the allegation.
Charles Coughlin
they should have proof, or be able to identify an object that was accused of being stolen
You would need at least enough money to purchase the hardware necessary for recording, and producing copies of the recordings. If you have no money yourself, you might look for an investor that can help you get started.
RAM may contribue to the smoothness when recording FRAPS. However, a person should also have enough RAM on their graphics card in order to produce smooth images as well.
No not really. You will have to keep them out of the studio, or get a noise filtering system.
Question makes very little sense. If you are "wrongfully accused" you defend yourself in court and MAKE the prosecution present enough evidence to prove that you did it. If you are convicted . . . the jury believed the evidence and not your story.
If the information is not enough to clearly identify the person accused it will likely be dismissed.
A preliminary hearing might better balance the rights of society and the rights of the accused. With a preliminary hearing a judge is going to weigh the evidence and decide if there is enough evidence for trial. With a grand jury, a group of citizens decides if there is enough evidence for trial.
Not enough is known about the offense, or the accused individual, or the entire event to even hazard a guess.