If everyone shared the planet with everyone else, yes. Even if the people who "own" land, air, water, and other material rescources would share them and not seek profit off them, this planet could easily support everyones needs.
I would say a crisis is the result of a conflict. The conflict escalates into a crisis when it takes too long to solve the issue and other issues get intermingled into the conflict creating a crisis.
If I could I think I would be extreemly rich!
No way. The US would never let a dictator run their country to solve a problem.
You need a renewable source of fuel so the economy would stabilize.
The Nullification Crisis
You'd be worked harder, because of the crisis, but the master would probably be more considerate to you, partly through shared privations, and for fear of you escaping to the North.
Ther e was a family crisis.
Dictators were important in ancient Rome because they were appointed in times of crisis. Crisis is the key word. When there was a major crisis its solution was debated in the senate with all senators having the right to air their views. This could take days. (There were anywhere from five to six hundred senators, depending upon the time) So to avoid long drawn out, time consuming debates , the senate would vote to appoint a dictator with authority to solve the problem.Dictators were important in ancient Rome because they were appointed in times of crisis. Crisis is the key word. When there was a major crisis its solution was debated in the senate with all senators having the right to air their views. This could take days. (There were anywhere from five to six hundred senators, depending upon the time) So to avoid long drawn out, time consuming debates , the senate would vote to appoint a dictator with authority to solve the problem.Dictators were important in ancient Rome because they were appointed in times of crisis. Crisis is the key word. When there was a major crisis its solution was debated in the senate with all senators having the right to air their views. This could take days. (There were anywhere from five to six hundred senators, depending upon the time) So to avoid long drawn out, time consuming debates , the senate would vote to appoint a dictator with authority to solve the problem.Dictators were important in ancient Rome because they were appointed in times of crisis. Crisis is the key word. When there was a major crisis its solution was debated in the senate with all senators having the right to air their views. This could take days. (There were anywhere from five to six hundred senators, depending upon the time) So to avoid long drawn out, time consuming debates , the senate would vote to appoint a dictator with authority to solve the problem.Dictators were important in ancient Rome because they were appointed in times of crisis. Crisis is the key word. When there was a major crisis its solution was debated in the senate with all senators having the right to air their views. This could take days. (There were anywhere from five to six hundred senators, depending upon the time) So to avoid long drawn out, time consuming debates , the senate would vote to appoint a dictator with authority to solve the problem.Dictators were important in ancient Rome because they were appointed in times of crisis. Crisis is the key word. When there was a major crisis its solution was debated in the senate with all senators having the right to air their views. This could take days. (There were anywhere from five to six hundred senators, depending upon the time) So to avoid long drawn out, time consuming debates , the senate would vote to appoint a dictator with authority to solve the problem.Dictators were important in ancient Rome because they were appointed in times of crisis. Crisis is the key word. When there was a major crisis its solution was debated in the senate with all senators having the right to air their views. This could take days. (There were anywhere from five to six hundred senators, depending upon the time) So to avoid long drawn out, time consuming debates , the senate would vote to appoint a dictator with authority to solve the problem.Dictators were important in ancient Rome because they were appointed in times of crisis. Crisis is the key word. When there was a major crisis its solution was debated in the senate with all senators having the right to air their views. This could take days. (There were anywhere from five to six hundred senators, depending upon the time) So to avoid long drawn out, time consuming debates , the senate would vote to appoint a dictator with authority to solve the problem.Dictators were important in ancient Rome because they were appointed in times of crisis. Crisis is the key word. When there was a major crisis its solution was debated in the senate with all senators having the right to air their views. This could take days. (There were anywhere from five to six hundred senators, depending upon the time) So to avoid long drawn out, time consuming debates , the senate would vote to appoint a dictator with authority to solve the problem.
people didn't realize that some inventions would hurt the planet now we do but people do not care to solve these problems because it is too expensive effforts have been made to solve world problems and it will take a long time to be cured
Showing the question would help to solve it.
If a dwarf star crashed into a planet,the planet would likely explode.
the problem is that Neptune is a way to cold place to check anything out . it is -235 degrees and it is a water planet so no one would be able to research on the planet or even Set foot on it , also Neptune is a gas planet so you wouldn't be able to even breath there