No, because some people slouch very badly. That's not sitting up, is it..
It doesn't matter how tall the person is because they look the same when sitting down.
If it is short, pull it down and smooth it in the back as you are sitting, and keep your knees together. Cross your feet on the floor. If the skirt is long, you would still sit down the same way, but you do not have to be as concerned about exposure.
It is the same as ''high-five''. Only you start it by squatting, not by sitting down.
End on is when the stage is on the floor and the audience are on a raked seating bank looking down on the stage. This allows for good sight lines, those sitting in the front aren't on the same level as the stage and those sitting at the back are looking down.
No. In order to be parallel, two lines would have to have the same slope, and different intercepts.Why? Two lines with different slopes, but the same intercepts would result in two intersecting lines. Two lines with the same slope, and the same intercept would result in the same line. Two lines with the same slope, and different intercepts would be parallel.
he ether like you or who ever you where sitting with. be careful you are not reading too much into nothing
Juniper
Nothing is wrong with sitting on your brothers lap.. Its just like sitting in your fathers lap
The birds would add weight to the plane whether they were sitting or flying inside. The force from a bird's wings would push down on the air inside the plane, which pushes down on the floor of the plane.This is based on another riddle about a truck full of pigeons crossing a rickety bridge. The truck would weight the same whether the pigeons were sitting or flying about in their cages. However, if the back or side of the truck is open, a small amount of energy would escape the system and the birds' full weight would appear to be less.
If smaller means less power for the same voltage, then a smaller bulb would result in less brightness. If smaller means less voltage for the same power, then a smaller builb would result in more brightness.
Yes you can say would and have in the same sentence. (for example)I would have to go down the other lane.
Sort of. They had inns and pubs. These are not the same concept we have today of going in someplace and sitting down for dinner. There would have been no menu and the food was for the overnight guest sleeping there. They also would have no choice in what they ate. It was probably one or two items and if you didn't like it too bad.