It's possible that this will work, but the idea is highly inefficient at its best. Black sand is a general term, but there is black sand which has some iron oxide in it. This kind of iron oxide (there's more than one kind) is ferromagnetic, and it can be attracted by a magnet, as you'd expect. But there are problems. Should black sand be applied in a manner that distributes it widely, it can then "collect" oil on the surface of the particles and be attracted to a magnet bringing the oil with it (if the magnet is strong enough, close enough, etc.). But though the collection of the oil clinging to the black sand particles could be accomplished via a magnet, it would be easier to simply use absorbent materials to gather the oil. Also, there are a lot more bales of hay (or straw) around than bags of black sand.
If the oil is concentrated enough for the black sand/magnet approach to be effective, absorbent pads would work a lot better to collect the oil. Particles of black sand can only collect material sticking to their very limited surface area (in spite of the large number of particles. Absorbent fibers trap far more oil through capillary action and "stiction" to and between the fibers than sand particles. Ask yourself this question: "Which will collect oil more efficiently, a hair (a fiber) or a particle of sand?" The hair has far, far more surface area than the sand particle, and hair fibers or some kind of fibers are at the heart of absorbent pads. Cat litter would work far better to collect oil (though it cannot be attracted by a magnet) than black sand. In addition to greater effectiveness, fibers are light, cheap and readily available. And they will float easily.
Certainly if you had enough black sand, you could build a berm in shallow water outside a sensitive marsh and protect it that way. (Sand is being strategically deposited to perform this function as this answer is being written, by the way.) The black sand/magnet idea is a good one, but it is far too inefficient to work well. The physics is pretty clear, and thinking it through will reveal the truth.
Iron oxide (rust) Isn't magnetic. So rusted iron will have less pure iron in it. making it less magnetic.
No pure white sand usually doesn't have metal in it only small grains of quartz, but the best way to find out would be test it. However some sand contains black magnetic iron oxide particles (AKA Iron(II,III) oxide, (Fe3O4) ferrous ferric oxide, magnetite, lodestone). These sand grains would be attracted to a magnet
'cause it reacts to a magnetic source.
Because the Earth has a Magnetic filed - with magnetic poles at roughly the same places as the geographic North and South poles, a freely suspended magnet will tend to orient to point in the direction of those magnetic poles. Also - because the magnetic poles exist - when natural forces cause iron to liquefy, there is tendency for it to align with the magnetic field of the earth - creating the famous "lodestones" that were sometimes used by ancient mariners to create compasses.Note that lodestones are not pure iron, rather they are magnetite - Iron(II,III) oxide)
MICR is used to facilitate the processing of cheques in banking systems. the data is typed in magnetic ink, mostly iron oxide which can be detected by a magnetic ink character reader and processed.
Tape recording is a magnetic process; sound is translated into a pattern of magnetic fields which is recorded by a magnetic material (usually ferric oxide) that coats a plastic tape.
Yes, a magnet would remove the iron filings without attracting the copper salts, copper salts are not magnetic.
Iron oxide (rust) Isn't magnetic. So rusted iron will have less pure iron in it. making it less magnetic.
No, it's a permanent magnet. It consists of an iron oxide, and iron is a permanent magnet.
No pure white sand usually doesn't have metal in it only small grains of quartz, but the best way to find out would be test it. However some sand contains black magnetic iron oxide particles (AKA Iron(II,III) oxide, (Fe3O4) ferrous ferric oxide, magnetite, lodestone). These sand grains would be attracted to a magnet
No, it's a permanent magnet. It consists of an iron oxide, and iron is a permanent magnet.
No.
The redness of sand is determined by the level of Iron Oxide (think rust) spread throughout the sand in question. High levels of Iron Oxide are indicated by a distinctly red hue, and low levels with sand that does not look red in the slightest. While there may be other factors, Iron Oxide distribution is by far the greatest.
No, standard hematite, a form of iron oxide, is not attracted to a magnet. See the related link to the right for more information on hematite from a layperson's point of view.
Magnetite, an iron oxide mineral is magnetic. It is also called 'lodestone'.
The possible words having to do with magnetism are: magnet - object exerting magnetic force magnetic - (adjective) having the properties of a magnet, or attractive magnetite - (mineral) an iron oxide displaying magnetic properties
Rust is hydrated iron(III) oxide.