answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Answer 1:

Sometimes. It depends on the court you were accused in, the nature of the accuser, the crime(s) accused of, the jurisdiction, etc.

Answer 2:

In criminal matters, it is not actually the "victim" that "presses charges", it is the District Attorney. True, the "victim" is asked if they want to press charges, but this is still the District Attorney's exclusive decision. A person may want charges pressed, but the DA declines. Or the person may not want charges pressed, but the DA does anyway.

But while in all cases it is actually the District Attorney pressing the charges, you cannot recover the costs of your defense from that DA. The District Attorney is an agent of the government, enjoys what is called "sovereign immunity" and is presumed to have acted in good faith - even when blatantly they were not.

In some very rare cases, you might be able to prove the DA did not act in good faith, but this would be more likely to result in punishment to the DA, not reimbursement to you.

Now. You do have the ability to sue the original accuser, the supposed "victim". If you feel the person lied to the police, perjured themselves, or otherwise acted in a way that caused you the material harm of having to pay for an attorney, you can sue them.

You may or may not win. If you only got found not guilty due to a technicality, and actually did do it, you'd do best to leave well enough alone. And even if you are truly innocent, that's not the same as being able to convince a jury that the alleged "victim" is a bad enough person to owe you money.

For instance, was it a woman raped, who wrongly accused you? If she did not know you, and only ever said "I couldn't quite see him, it was too dark, yes, that might be him." in response to the police showing her you in a line up, then she is guilty of little more than being confused. I doubt you'd win against her.

On the other hand, if she accused you of rape, and actually knew you, and had clearly said that it was definitely you, but then it turned out that it could not have been you, and she lied to try and blackmail you...well then, you'd probably win and win big on that one.

Bear in mind, though, that most civil suits have to be paid for up front. Meaning more attorney fees for you until you win. Which you might or might not. Everyone always thinks that an attorney will just sue for a percentage of the win, but this is not the case. They only do that if the person being sued is very rich - so there's something to actually win - and if they think they have a reasonable chance of winning or settling.

If your accuser is some regular joe or jane, with no assets and only a modest income, if any, then you will not find an attorney to take that one on, unless you pay them a fee up front. Your average suit will start at $1,500 - if not $5,000. And will only go up.

It may then be best to do this: Consult with an attorney. Usually they will do this for free. If they agree to take the case for a percent, then great! That means they think they'll win, and get money for you. But if they say, "I'll take it, but I'll need X amount up front.", then thank him for his time and walk away.

For he'll have just told you in lawyerese, "I don't think I'll win, or if I do there won't be any money to collect."

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: If you were accused of a crime and found not guilty can you recover attorney fees from your accuser?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is the difference between guilty or not guilty?

Guilty means that a person admits to committing the crime they were accused of. Not guilty means that a person denies committing the crime and the prosecution must prove their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in court.


Can someone be fired from work if she was accused of having a relationship with a married man?

The accuser has to have sufficient evidence. It'll probably be taken to court, and if the accused if found guilty, she will most likely get fired. Any type of scandal ruins the reputation of the employer and the company.


How did hammurabis code impact justice?

It provided the first idea of "Innocent until proven guilty." It also shows the first signs of constitution and states that both the accuser and the accused have the right to speak.


Will the DA prosecute the accuser after defendant is found not guilty?

Not unless it is suspected, and can be proved, that the accuser perjured themselves in their accusation and testimony.


How do courts make a decision?

Say a criminal is accused. The criminal will have a defense attorney. In court, the defense attorney argues with the prosecutor. In his cross-examination with the witness, he tries to find a contradiction, to show the defendant is NOT GUILTY. In the end, the Jury declares if the accused is GUILTY or NOT GUILTY. It really depends on what happened during the trial.


When the accused states whether they are guilty or not guilty?

When the accused states that they are guilty, they are admitting to committing the crime they have been charged with. If they plead not guilty, it means they are denying the charges against them and the case will proceed to trial where the prosecution will have to prove their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.


What are three Roman principals that are used today?

1) Innocent untill proven guilty 2) All citizens have the right to equal treatment under law 3) The burden of proof rests with the accuser rather than the accused


What was law 196 in Hammurabi's code?

If anyone bring an accusation against a man, and the accused go to the river and leap into the river, if he sink in the river his accuser shall take possession of his house. But if the river prove that the accused is not guilty,and he escape unhurt,then he who brought the accusation shall be put to death, while he who leaped into the river shall take possession of the house that had belonged to his accuser.


What federal constitutional protections are guaranteed a defendant accused of a crime?

You have the rights listed below: # You have the right to remain silent # Anything you say can and may be used against you in the court of law # You have the right to have an attorney # If you can not afford one, one will be appointed to you


A what is the trial jury that decides whether the accused is guilty or not guilty?

Petit jury


What if your partner thinks you are cheating but you are not?

I have found that the accuser should be the accusee. Meaning they are cheating and have a guilty conscience.


Is this the correct way to spell accused?

Yes, the correct spelling is "accused" (alleged to be guilty).