Not really, because spouses of cousins aren't part of the kinship system in the United States. (However, you can opt to start calling each other "cousin" if you like--there's no rule against it.)
Yes, if your friend's cousin marries your cousin, you would be related by marriage. However, the specific term for your relationship would be "cousin-in-law."
You do share a common ancestor. You parent would be a fifth cousin one removed. You would be a fifth cousin twice removed.
I would not think so. It will depend how you look at it
Your aunt marrying your friend's uncle does not make you and your friend blood relatives. I don't think there would be a problem with you and your friend marrying.
The term 'Dutch' cousin or 'Dutch' uncle usually refer to someone that is treated as family, but has no actual relation to you. Typically a Dutch cousin would be the kids of some of your parent's best friends or perhaps step children of real aunts and uncles.
"Cousin" describes a family relationship in which two people are descended from the same ancestor, other than from a parent. There is no precise "opposite" to Cousin the way "night" is the opposite of "day", but many people have used "cousin" indescriminately to describe anyone who is not a parent, grandparent, child, or sibling, but who is related to them. In that general sense, then, the opposite of "cousin" would be "unrelated." There really is no opposite word; the opposite of a paternal cousin is a maternal cousin.
you would be cousin in laws
Technically, your'e not related if they're not married. If they were married, your uncle's girlfriend would be your 'aunt', so her daughter would be your 'first cousin' and her baby would be your 'first cousin, once removed."
Your are related to some of your first cousin's aunts and not to others. The aunts of your first cousin to whom you may be related are your mother and her sisters or your father's sisters. One of the parents of your first cousin isn't related to you, but married into the family. Anyone of your cousins aunts who are related to that person would not be related to you.
Yes, he would still be your cousin, but he would also be your uncle.
Your cousin's child would be your first cousin once removed. So, your cousin's adopted child would be your adopted first cousin once removed?
Regardless of what kind of cousin you are talking about (first, second, fifth, once removed, thrice removed, etc.) your cousin's husband is not related to you. If you need to refer to him other than by name, you can call him "my cousin's husband" or "my uncle's son-in-law."
i dont think you would unless they had a kid but if not then no cuz it would be through marrage not blood.
You are not related to your cousin's husband. He would simply be "My cousin's husband."
Your first cousin once removed is the child of your first cousin. Let's call her Jane.Jane's first cousin may be the child of your first cousin's sibling. If so, that would also be your first cousin once removed.However, in order to produce Jane, your first cousin married someone. That person will have siblings whose children are also Jane's first cousins, but who are not related to you at all.So, the first cousin of your first cousin once removed is also your first cousin once removed, or is not related to you at all.
I'm not sure why you were specific about the fact that it's a lifeguard (generally speaking somebody's occupation doesn't have any bearing on how they are related to people), but your cousin will still be your cousin, and the lifeguard (who I am assuming is the bride) will be your cousin-in-law.
He could be your brother. He could be a first cousin. If the uncle married into the family (Married the sister of one of your parents), the brother would not be related in any way and neither would his son.
If it is legal where you are, not much if you married your first cousin. You live 'happily' every after or not, as the case may be.