if (this->next) this->next->prev= this->prev;
else list->last= this->prev;
if (this->prev) this->prev->next= this->next;
else list->first= this->next;
free (this);
I'm sorry brother
To implement a doubly linked list using a singly linked list, you can create two nodes in each element of the singly linked list - one for the next element and another for the previous element. This way, each node will have access to both its previous and next nodes, effectively creating a doubly linked list structure using a singly linked list implementation.
You'll need to use a doubly-linked circular list, since otherwise when you pop off the tail element you'll need to whizz all the way round the list to find its predecessor. See the links section for an implementation of a doubly-linked circular list.
Add weights to the elements of the queue and use an algorithm to sort the queue every time an element is added.
Yes it is possible to implement stack and queue using linked list
store the exor of the previous node address and next node address in each node of single linked list .further exor the nodes to proceed forward or backward as necessary
If you are using the doubly-linked list from the STL library, then the function call:name_of_list.push_back();should delete the last element.
Advantages of single linked list: # Decrease in storage space per linked list node # Simpler implementation Advantages of double linked list # Decrease in work when accessing a random node # Decrease in work when inserting or deleting a node
A singly linked list is a linked list which only provides links in "one direction". Using a metaphor, a singly linked list is a one way street, while a doubly linked list is a two way street. Once you move forward in a singly linked list, there is no way to go backwards unless you kept your reference/pointer from before. A singly linked list would look like this: start ----> node1---->node2---->node3 ----> NULL You will see that node2 only has a link forward to node3 - it does not have a link backwards to node1, even though node1 has a link forwards to node2. To prevent us from permanently losing access to portions of the linked list, we generally keep a reference/pointer to "start". A doubly linked list would have twice the number of pointers/references as a singly linked list - making it very inefficient to store small datatypes. On the other hand, it would be possible to move both forwards and backwards with a doubly linked list because you have links pointing both forwards and backwards.
Stacks are often implemented using the same node structure as a linked list.
Doubly unlikely.
He decided to implement his plan.