No, the Ancient Greek number system did not use zero as a place value, or number for that matter.
They contain a zero symbol whereas Roman numerals do not contain a zero symbol because it's not needed
A zero symbol.
Zero cannot be represented in Roman Numerals.
Roman numerals do not include a symbol for zero, so zero cannot be rendered in Roman numberals.
It can't be represented by any symbol.Another Answer:-The symbol for zero as a Roman numeral is N but it is never needed because the positional place value of Roman numerals are self evident.
They contain a zero symbol whereas Roman numerals do not contain a zero symbol because it's not needed
A zero symbol.
Zero cannot be represented in Roman Numerals.
Roman numerals do not include a symbol for zero, so zero cannot be rendered in Roman numberals.
The lack of a zero symbol creates no problems with Roman numerals.
It can't be represented by any symbol.Another Answer:-The symbol for zero as a Roman numeral is N but it is never needed because the positional place value of Roman numerals are self evident.
There is no symbol for zero in Roman numerals because it isn't neeeded.
The number zero does not have a significance in Roman numerals because the Romans did not have a symbol for zero. Roman numerals are based on a system of adding and subtracting values of different symbols to represent numbers.
There is no symbol for zero, which makes it very difficult to do arithmetic.
DIX (there is no symbol for zero).
It lacked a zero symbol which was not needed
The representation of 0 in Roman numerals is not applicable as the Romans did not have a symbol for zero in their numerical system.