No, the Ancient Greek number system did not use zero as a place value, or number for that matter.
They contain a zero symbol whereas Roman numerals do not contain a zero symbol because it's not needed
Zero cannot be represented in Roman Numerals.
A zero symbol.
Roman numerals do not include a symbol for zero, so zero cannot be rendered in Roman numberals.
It can't be represented by any symbol.Another Answer:-The symbol for zero as a Roman numeral is N but it is never needed because the positional place value of Roman numerals are self evident.
They contain a zero symbol whereas Roman numerals do not contain a zero symbol because it's not needed
Zero cannot be represented in Roman Numerals.
A zero symbol.
Roman numerals do not include a symbol for zero, so zero cannot be rendered in Roman numberals.
It can't be represented by any symbol.Another Answer:-The symbol for zero as a Roman numeral is N but it is never needed because the positional place value of Roman numerals are self evident.
The lack of a zero symbol creates no problems with Roman numerals.
There is no symbol for zero in Roman numerals because it isn't neeeded.
The number zero does not have a significance in Roman numerals because the Romans did not have a symbol for zero. Roman numerals are based on a system of adding and subtracting values of different symbols to represent numbers.
There is no symbol for zero, which makes it very difficult to do arithmetic.
It lacked a zero symbol which was not needed
DIX (there is no symbol for zero).
The representation of 0 in Roman numerals is not applicable as the Romans did not have a symbol for zero in their numerical system.