0
In Korematsu v. US the Supreme Court upheld which policy toward Japanese Americans?
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
removal to internment camps
Christophe Welch
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoThey held that the need to protect against espionage outweighed the rights of Fred Korematsu, and permitted Executive order 9066 to be carried out - which authorized the Secretary of War to prescribe certain areas as military zones, clearing the way for the deportation of Japanese-Americans (and German Americans and Italian Americans) - without regard to their citizenship - to be removed from their homes and placed in "internment camps". Although the Order included German and Italian American residents of the USA, it was primarily used to removed Japanese-Americans from the West Coast.
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoremoval to internment camps
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which wartime policy was upheld toward Japanese Americans by the Supreme Court?
Confinement in internment camps
What did the supreme court decide in Korematsu v. US?
The decision upheld the legality of the wartime internment policy
What did the supreme court decide in case korematsu v. US?
The decision upheld the legality of the wartime internment policy
What was the supreme court ruling in korematsu v. the US?
Korematsu v. United States, 323 US 214 (1944), was a landmark US Supreme Court case concerning the constitutionality of a Presidential Order, which ordered Japanese-Americans into intenment camps during WWII. In a 3-6 decision, the Court sided with the government, ruling that the exclusion order was constitutional.The Korematsu decision has never been explicitly overturned, but remains significant both for being the first instance of the Supreme Court applying the strict scrutinystandard to racial discrimination by the government and for being one of only a handful of cases in which the Court held that the government met that standard.
How did the us government policy of internment affect thousands of Japanese Americans of the west coast of the US?
Japanese Americans were temporarily imprisoned in isolated locations
How did the us government policy of intrnment affect thousands of Japanese Americans on the west coast of the US?
Japanese Americans were temporarily imprisoned in isolated locations
How did the Us. government policy of internment affect thousands of Japanese-Americans on the west coast of the US?
Japanese Americans were temporarily imprisoned in isolated locations
How did the U.S. government policy of internment affect thousands of Japanese Americans of the west coast of the US?
Japanese Americans were temporarily imprisoned in isolated locations
How did the us government policy of internment affect thousands of Japanese Americans on the west coast of the US?
The effects on the internment of Japanese-Americans was negative psychologically. Shock and fear plagued the Japanese-Americans as a result of the internment camps.
What was US Policy towards aliens and Japanese Americans in World War 2?
The policy towards Japanese-American citizens was to place them into Internment (Concentration) Camps .
What US policies violated the constitutional rights of citizens during World War 2?
The US policy to intern the Japanese Americans (Canadians did too) was unconstitutional. They did not release them even after the US Supreme Court determined it was unconstitutional for the US Government to set of the internment camps, take the Japanese Americans from their homes. They took their homes and businesses too and that was illegal. Some Japanese Americans have received paltry reparations for their illegal internment.
What U.S. policies violated the constitutional rights of some citizens during World War 2?
The US policy to intern the Japanese Americans (Canadians did too) was unconstitutional. They did not release them even after the US Supreme Court determined it was unconstitutional for the US Government to set of the internment camps, take the Japanese Americans from their homes. They took their homes and businesses too and that was illegal. Some Japanese Americans have received paltry reparations for their illegal internment.
