Because he is a jilted father whose son had hit him in the face once during a verbal argument, and he has not seen or spoken to him since, causing him great pain coupled with rage. So, the fact that this boy could kill his father is a loathsome thing to him, and he is bent on convicting the boy based on the flimsy evidence submitted.
His anger towards the defendant stems from the estrangement from his own teen-aged son, causing him to be hateful and hostile toward all young people.
He lost his relationship with his son.
Juror #3
Well, she is sort of sad 'cause of James... And angry because everybody is protecting Bella so she can't kill her.
the insane killer killed donna's friends to get two donna. also because he was an angry sick and insane man. the insane killer killed donna's friends to get two donna. also because he was an angry sick and insane man.
hey cat valentine im a big fan and i was wondering if you could lone me your number cause i am 11 and i want to talk to a super star
I can't answer that question cause I am just Eight years old
Juror #3
Actually, yes. That is the time when hormones cause a child to be confused, arguable, angry.
This is a "peremptory challenge." Court rules usually give each attorney a limited number of peremptory challenges. The other type of challenge is a challenge for cause, meaning there is some good cause for dismissing the juror. Cause can mean being related to or knowing one of the parties, being opposed to the death penalty in capital cases or anything that will prevent a juror from freely and fairly rendering a just verdict in the case at hand. Court rules give an unlimited number of challenges for cause.
Voir Dire, or jury selection. When attorneys choose a jury, a panel is seated, and the attorneys question the jurors about their backgrounds and biases. Each side takes turn striking members from the panel in order to form the jury. Attorneys use their limited premptory strikes to strike a juror for any (unstated) reason. A juror will be struck for cause if the court finds that the juror is unable to be unbiased. The challenge for cause means the attorney is asking the court to find that the juror is unable to serve, and that he be struck and not counted against the limited number of strikes.
When selecting a jury, either party can make an unlimited number of challenges to potential jurors for cause. For example, if a proposed juror was a the brother of the defendant, the juror would be challenged the judge would excuse the juror because it would be unfair to have him on the jury. To challenge a proposed juror for cause, the party has to tell the judge why it would be unfair to seat that juror and the judge may accept or reject the challenge. Each party also has a set number of peremptory challenges, the party excludes the juror without cause and the judge has no say. For example, if the defendant is a school teacher, you might not want another school teacher to be on the jury but you don't have any evidence that it would be unfair. While there are few limits to peremptory challenges, they cannot be used to create a discriminatory jury. For example, if the defendant is Hispanic, you cannot use all of your peremptory challenges to eliminate all the potential Hispanic jurors.
When they go through the process of Voire Dire, or the picking of the jury, a juror is presented and both attorneys get to ask a question of them. Then they either accept or don't accept that juror. If there is a disagreement between the prosecution and defense the judge decides.Each side gets a set number of "challenges for cause" and "peremptory (no cause) challenges."
it composite cause you can times it by 1 2 3 4 6 12
It's a request to dismiss a juror because of possible bias.
Do not approach any raccoon even if is not angry. If it is angry you have probably done something to cause the anger,
Did you do something that would cause them to be?
yes he is very angry
No cause he is mean and is a angry man