Yes. But everyone else also is an owner of the same property.
Most communist governments own all the businesses and property and the people lease them from the state. However more and more communist nations are dabbling in the free market lately. China still owns most of the businesses in China, but a few small mom and pop operations have been allowed to flourish.
People don't own property. The state does.
Briefly it means that legally married people can own property in their own, sole capacity, even when acquired after marriage. Their spouse is not automatically given any interest in that property as they would be in a community property state.Briefly it means that legally married people can own property in their own, sole capacity, even when acquired after marriage. Their spouse is not automatically given any interest in that property as they would be in a community property state.Briefly it means that legally married people can own property in their own, sole capacity, even when acquired after marriage. Their spouse is not automatically given any interest in that property as they would be in a community property state.Briefly it means that legally married people can own property in their own, sole capacity, even when acquired after marriage. Their spouse is not automatically given any interest in that property as they would be in a community property state.
The state of North Carolina is not a community property state. They are an equitable distribution state which means each spouse is allowed to own their own property.
In a Communist society only the collective of the proletariat (i.e. all of the workers as a community) can own property. Individual or company property ownership is abolished.
Centralized planning: the state determines what to produce and how much of it to produce Communal property of land: individuals don't own land.. the State owns all the land.
Property own prior married
Your land, maybe even your house, in some cases your own business, since under some forms of communism the means of production are owned by the people, or the state that purports to represent them.
This is a question that would be inapplicable to a Communist society. Keeping in mind that these things are up for argument, think of the situation more like this: - Under capitalism, one could look at a factory (i.e., a piece of the means of production) and tell me who owns it. - In the transition from capitalism to Communism (which is what some socialists mean by the word socialism), one might say that "the people" or "the state" owns the factory. - In a Communist world, one might look at a factory, ask someone who owns it, and have that person answer "Own? What do you mean?" In other words, the concept of ownership, at least as it pertains to non-personal items, would be inapplicable.
Cuba is not a state. It is a country, with a communist regime as the type of government. It has its own flag and constitution.
According to Karl Marx under true communism the means of production will be not so much owned by the people as simply administered by them without the vestiges of private ownership of property. The state will not own property under communism, because the state, as well as class differences, will wither and die. The state will not be overthrown; it will vanish. The state will own the means of production during the socialist phase of history leading up to true communism.
Mississippi