answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Neither party can obligate the other party to something. They cannot represent the other party to the agreement. They can't buy something and say the other party is going to pay for it.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: In an agreement was is meant by neither party has the authority to bind the other party?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

After a divorce does the ex husband have any authority over his ex wife?

No. Once a couple has divorced neither has any legal claim against the other outside the divorce decree and separation agreement, nor any authority over the other. Their legal relationship has been dissolved and they are strangers to each other.


What is a tongue piercing meant for?

A tongue piercing is neither meant for anything nor has any meaning; it's just for aesthetics like any other piercing. It's meant to look good.


What is meant by alliance?

It means an agreement made between two or more countries to give each other help if it is needed.


What agreement between Germany and the soviet union promised that neither country would attack each other and also split Poland between the two countries?

This agreement was known as the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.


What do NCOs not have the authority to do?

NCO do not have the authority to "impose nonjudicial punishments on other enlisted soldiers." This means that any disciple must be within the law and this is meant to protect soldiers rights.ÊÊ


What is meant by the terms alliance?

An alliance is an agreement made between two or more countries to give each other help if it is needed.


What is meant by the term triple entente?

The triple entente is a 20th century agreement between the countries of Great Britain, France, and Russia. In this agreement, the three countries agreed not to attack each other during WW1.


What key events showed Queen Elizabeth I's authority?

There are no events that can show Queen Elizabeth's authority basically because she has no authority other than the authority of force. This is the same with all monarchs and Governments . What could possibly give someone authority over you. There are only two things, there was an agreement or there was a contract. Anything else is force, force does not show authority. ruling by might is not authority it is tyranny. The one thing that everyone needs to ask themselves is how did someone or thing get authority over you. One who submits to public policy does just that, submits which means an agreement has been made. Seeing that authority and jurisdiction is synonymous you may want to check out this page. http://geneticmemory.org/joomla/content/view/212/26/ There are many other pages dealing with authority and jurisdiction on this site just look in the section tool times.


what is benefits of proof of authority blockchain?

Other than diminishing how much power important to keep up with the organization, the Proof of Authority Blockchain calculation improves on the approval cycle. The agreement likewise has a progression of advantages that ought to be thought of. No requirement for refined equipment The PoW agreement calculation requires superior execution equipment to tackle the complex numerical undertakings important for approving squares. Further developed exchange rates The Proof of Authority calculation speeds up at which the specialists approve exchanges. Resilience to 51% assaults The PoA agreement should be considerably more impervious to assaults than the PoW agreement. That is on the grounds that the organization can't be undermined by a client who figures out how to create 51% of the computational power. The important point The Proof of Authority Blockchain agreement calculation is probably the most ideal choice accessible today for private blockchains.


Does Quebec have reciprocity agreement with Virginia?

Quebec is part of Canada, Virginia part of the US. Neither can directly enact agreements with the other. The Canadian govt makes agreements with the US govt.


Why does the Cambridge Agreement set the Massachusetts Bay Company apart from the other joint-stock companies established in the American colonies?

All other joint-stock companies remained governed by a board in England, whereas the Cambridge Agreement stated that the governing authority of the company would move to New England with the members of the company that went.


What does the phrase all other persons mean in Art 1 Sec 2 Par 3 of the constitution?

"All other persons" meant all persons who were neither free nor untaxed Indians. Basically, it meant slaves. The phrase "all other persons" was eliminated by Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment.