Child custody
It isn’t up to a governor concerning extradition. It is up to the courts.
Until 1980s, it was allowed. In Kennedy v. Dennison, 1861, the Supreme Court held that the constitution didn't give the Federal government that right. For more than a century, the word 'shall' in the Extradition clause was read as 'may'.Then in 1987, Puerto Rico v. Branstad, it was unanimous that the federal courts can indeed order an unwilling governor to extradite a fugitive.
Until 1980s, it was allowed. In Kennedy v. Dennison, 1861, the Supreme Court held that the constitution didn't give the Federal government that right. For more than a century, the word 'shall' in the Extradition clause was read as 'may'.Then in 1987, Puerto Rico v. Branstad, it was unanimous that the federal courts can indeed order an unwilling governor to extradite a fugitive.
Until 1980s, it was allowed. In Kennedy v. Dennison, 1861, the Supreme Court held that the constitution didn't give the Federal government that right. For more than a century, the word 'shall' in the Extradition clause was read as 'may'.Then in 1987, Puerto Rico v. Branstad, it was unanimous that the federal courts can indeed order an unwilling governor to extradite a fugitive.
If Alabama wants you, it is unlikely that Alaska will refuse to send you back.
Our countries might not grant diplomatic recogniztion to one another. Also, if it is a death penalty case, some countries do not believe in the death penalty and will refuse to extradite someone to the US unless they receive diplomatic assurance that the death penalty will not be asked for.
Until 1980s, it was allowed. In Kennedy v. Dennison, 1861, the Supreme Court held that the constitution didn't give the Federal government that right. For more than a century, the word 'shall' in the Extradition clause was read as 'may'.Then in 1987, Puerto Rico v. Branstad, it was unanimous that the federal courts can indeed order an unwilling governor to extradite a fugitive.
The United States maintains diplomatic relations, but does not have extradition treaties with the following countries: Afghanistan, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Armenia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brunei, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, China (People's Republic of China), Union of the Comoros, Congo, Democratic Republic of the, Cote d' Ivoire, Djibouti, Equatorial Guinea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Indonesia, Jordan, Kuwait, Laos, Lebanon, Libya, Madagascar, Maldives, Mali, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Micronesia, Moldova, Mongolia, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Niger, Oman, Qatar, Russian Federation, Rwanda, São Tomé and Príncipe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia and Montenegro, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Vanuatu, Vietnam, Western Samoa, Yemen, and Zimbabwe.
I do know the street that he lives on but I refuse to release that for safety concerns, And he works at th state house.
Yes, the Governor General of Canada can refuse to prorogue Parliament.Most of the powers of the Sovereign were transferred to the Governor General by Letters Patent Constituting the Office of the Governor General of Canada, 1947. Article VI of these letters patent vest in the Governor General the authority to summon, prorogue, and dissolve the Parliament of Canada. These powers are usually used on the advice of the Prime Minister.However, the Governor General does have the reserve power to refuse the advice of a prime minister to prorogue or dissolve the legislature. The circumstances under which the Queen's representative would refuse the advice of the Prime Minister are contested, but some common theories are as follows:Government defeated in the House of CommonsThe Governor General is only bound to accept the advice of a prime minister who enjoys the support of the elected House of Commons. Should a Government be defeated by the Lower House, then the Governor General would have cause to reject a request to prorogue Parliament.
No, you don't get a choice. The decision to extradite or not rests with the courts in the country where you have been apprehended. Depending on the country, you may or may not be allowed to present your case to the court before that decision is made.
Yes, the National Guard can refuse to federalize in certain circumstances, such as when the governor of a state does not consent to the federalization or when the President does not have the authority to federalize the National Guard for a specific purpose.