Until 1980s, it was allowed. In Kennedy v. Dennison, 1861, the Supreme Court held that the constitution didn't give the Federal government that right. For more than a century, the word 'shall' in the Extradition clause was read as 'may'.
Then in 1987, Puerto Rico v. Branstad, it was unanimous that the federal courts can indeed order an unwilling governor to extradite a fugitive.
It isn’t up to a governor concerning extradition. It is up to the courts.
Our countries might not grant diplomatic recogniztion to one another. Also, if it is a death penalty case, some countries do not believe in the death penalty and will refuse to extradite someone to the US unless they receive diplomatic assurance that the death penalty will not be asked for.
No, you don't get a choice. The decision to extradite or not rests with the courts in the country where you have been apprehended. Depending on the country, you may or may not be allowed to present your case to the court before that decision is made.
Yes, Hawaii can extradite individuals for felony charges in North Carolina, as both states adhere to the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act. Extradition typically occurs when there is an outstanding warrant or legal request from the state seeking the individual. However, the process may involve legal proceedings and considerations, including the nature of the charges and the circumstances of the case. Ultimately, the decision to extradite rests with the governor of Hawaii.
Virginia can extradite individuals to other states or jurisdictions for crimes committed, provided there is a valid extradition request and the legal criteria are met. The process typically involves a governor's warrant and can include hearings to determine the legality of the extradition. Virginia may also extradite individuals for federal offenses if requested by federal authorities. However, the specifics can vary based on the circumstances of each case and the laws governing extradition.
Then Alabama would deal with the Case.
The decision to extradite is normally made on a case by case basis. If it's felony bad check it will likely he handled differently from a felony assault.
All states extradite to all other states. Some wont extradite on some cases, but they are few and far between. If California asserts that they will extradite/accept the person back (and arrange the transportation), all states will cooperate with the extradition. You can try to run to a handful of other countries, but why not just get it behind you, and turn yourself in.
The United States maintains diplomatic relations, but does not have extradition treaties with the following countries: Afghanistan, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Armenia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brunei, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, China (People's Republic of China), Union of the Comoros, Congo, Democratic Republic of the, Cote d' Ivoire, Djibouti, Equatorial Guinea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Indonesia, Jordan, Kuwait, Laos, Lebanon, Libya, Madagascar, Maldives, Mali, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Micronesia, Moldova, Mongolia, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Niger, Oman, Qatar, Russian Federation, Rwanda, São Tomé and Príncipe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia and Montenegro, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Vanuatu, Vietnam, Western Samoa, Yemen, and Zimbabwe.
Yes, and in the case of felony crimes, most will.
If West Virginia agrees.
Yes, Virginia can extradite individuals for misdemeanor charges, but it is less common than for felony charges. Extradition typically depends on the specific circumstances of the case, including the nature of the misdemeanor and the policies of the state where the individual is located. Generally, states may be more inclined to extradite for serious offenses, so it may vary by case.