0
In the Mapp v. Ohio case the Supreme Court ruled it illegal for courts to accept evidence that was taken without a warrant. The court's decision protects the rights of U.S. citizens by?
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What department of federal government protects a citizens civil rights?
The supreme court and executive branch share this job
What was one of the findings of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott decision Slaves were citizens. Slaves were property. Slavery was illegal. Slavery was a choice each state could make.?
One of the findings of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott decision was that slaves were considered property, not citizens.
What document states that slaves were not citizens?
The Dred Scott v. Sandford Supreme Court decision in 1857 is the document that stated that slaves were not citizens and had no legal rights.
What did the supreme court dred Scott decision state?
no blacks, not even free blacks, could become U.S. citizens.
Is a Supreme Court decision permanent?
In most cases a Supreme Court decision is permanent. The current Supreme Court can change the decision of a previous Supreme Court.
What happens if you're not satisfied with the decision of the US Supreme Court?
You could appeal to the Supreme Court for a rehearing within 30 days of the decision, if you have new information or evidence to support your case; otherwise, the decision of the Court is final. In any given case, one side is satisfied and the other is not.
Supreme court case that ruled slaves were not citizens and could not sue?
In 1857, the Dred Scott vs Sanford case came before the US Supreme Court. Part of the decision in that case was that Blacks were not citizens and therefore could not bring a lawsuit to any court.
The case that protects the right to remain silent during police questioning is?
No case protects that right. The right is protected and codified by the Fifth Amendment to the US Constitution, and often in the individual state constitutions.Added: You are probably referring to the US Supreme Court case, Miranda V. Arizona, which gave rise to the Supreme Court decision to protect the arrestees rights, more commonly known as the Miranda Decision.
How did the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision affect all of the territories in the U.S.?
The decision made slaves property and said they didn't have rights of citizens, so no matter where they lived they were still property.
How did the abolitionists react to the supreme courts decision in the Dred Scott case?
Abolitionists were outraged by the Supreme Court's decision in the Dred Scott case, as it ruled that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not citizens and therefore did not have the right to sue in federal court. They saw this decision as a setback to the abolitionist movement and a reinforcement of the institution of slavery.
What famous US Supreme Court decision let American citizens know they have the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney?
Miranda Vs. Arizona
What was the major point made by the US Supreme Court regarding the Dred Scott decision?
The most significant part of the US Supreme Court's ruling on the Dred Scott case was actually two-fold. The Court by a 7-2 decision ruled that slavery was legal and that Blacks could never be US citizens because they were not white. Their race made it impossible for them to be US citizens.
