0
In the context of apologetics groothius thinks that it is sufficient to offer a defense against the problem of evil rather than offer a theodicy?
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Groothius argues that offering a defense against the problem of evil is more feasible than constructing a theodicy, as theodicies aim to provide a comprehensive explanation for why evil exists. Groothius believes that a defense can demonstrate that belief in God is reasonable despite the existence of evil, without needing to fully justify or explain the presence of evil in the world.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Was Edmund Randolph for or against slavery?
Edmund Randolph was a slave owner and a supporter of slavery. He did not advocate for the abolition of slavery and did not take a public stand against the practice during his lifetime.
Who brought charges against socrates?
Meletus, Anytus, and Lycon were the three accusers who brought charges against Socrates.
What was the charge brought against Socrates?
The charge brought against Socrates was impiety (not believing in the gods of the state) and corrupting the youth of Athens.
What does it mean to be against something?
To be against something means to be in opposition or disagreement with it. It involves expressing disapproval, criticism, or opposition towards that particular thing or idea.
In the 1800s a person who was against slavery was called a?
abolitionist.
What does polemicists mean in Greek?
Apologetics comes from the Greek word "apologia" which means the defense of a position against an attack
What does apologetic?
Apologetics means to defend something by use of intelligent argument. The Bible uses this word when it talks about when someone had an accusation against them (like court) the person had to defend himself by using intelligent arguments. So, apologetics has to do with defending the beliefs a person has.
What is a noun for apologetic?
Apologetics means to defend something by use of intelligent argument. The Bible uses this word when it talks about when someone had an accusation against them (like court) the person had to defend himself by using intelligent arguments. So, apologetics has to do with defending the beliefs a person has.
What kind of clothing do people in Florida?
same as anywhere else with a similar climate, sufficient to cover individual embarrassement, sufficient to be comfortable against the sun, the wind or the rain and the need to look presentable
Has anyone have a good protections against blastospores?
A good face mask should be sufficient - not all blastospores are deadly.
Why is the brady campaign against guns?
Because they serve a political agenda in which an armed and self-sufficient populace does not fit in with the agitprop.
What did the old testament prophets view to be the ultimate apologetic?
Apologetics didn't come about until the formation of Christianity. There is no such concept in Judaism and the Tanach (Jewish Bible) as Judaism teaches that there are different paths for different people and therefore doesn't have to defend itself against other religions.
Why is capillary action insufficient to move water through a plant?
Capillary action is not sufficient to lift water against gravity after certain height .
Does beezid give you your item?
Doubt it, the Better Business Bureau Has given them an F for many reasons:Based on BBB files, this business has a BBB -Rating of F on a Answers.comfrom A+ to F.Factor(s) that lowered this business' rating include:BBB does not have sufficient information to determine how long this business has been operating13 complaints filed against businessFailure to respond to 3 complaints filed against business2 serious complaints filed against businessBBB does not have sufficient background information on this business
Why are the Apologetics allowed to debate answers on the main page and not in the Discussion page as clearly written in R and S guidelines?
They are not "allowed" to. Those who do so are going against the rules of this site. However, simply expressing an opinion that differs from that of a previous answerer, is not the same as debating. All opinions are welcome. Arguing is not.
What was Napoleon Bonaparte's policy that was created to make continental Europe more self-sufficient?
The Continental System, which had a primary mission of Economic warfare against the UK.
Did people disagree with the US Constitution?
Most people who saw this new institution forming were against it. In a land where communities were self sufficient there was no need for a constitution of this kind.
