0
The judge's ruling in the Dred Scott case stated that slaves and freed slaves were not US citizens. Thus they had no power to sue in court and the federal government could not control slavery.
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Wiki User
∙ 15y agoFirst of all, your question makes absolutely no sense at all but, The Dread Scott Decision happened in 1857 and declared that Slaves were property no matter where they were and it was decided in the state of Washington D.C at the supreme court but the crime in question happened on the border of Kansas and Missouri
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who was the slave who sued for his freedom in the Supreme Court was?
Dred Scott
What Supreme Court case stated that Congress did not have the right to ban slavery in states and that blacks were not citizens?
The Dread Scott case was the Supreme Court case the stated that Congress did not have the right to ban slavery in states and that blacks were not citizens.
The 3 outcomes of the dread Scott case?
Scott was denied his freedom. The Court ruled that slavery was legal in every state of the Union. The ruling divided the two sections more than ever.
What was the second occasion when S.C.O.T.U.S declared an act of Congress unconstitutional?
After the Dread Scott case the Supreme Court declared the Missouri Compromise of 1820 unconstitutional
What African American sued for his freedom in 1846?
Dred Scott sued his master for his freedom on the grounds that he had been living on free soil for several years. The Supreme Court decided that he was not a citizen and had no legal right to sue.
What effect did the dread Scott decision have on slavery in the territories?
The verdict by the Supreme Court appeared to mean that all property, including slave property, was sacred, and that no state could declare itself to be free soil.
What was the supreme court's decision in Scott v sanford?
An unexpected ruling about the Constitution and its view of slavery. The court reckoned that when the Founding Fathers declared that a man's property was sacred, they would have included slaves within their definition of property. If so, then slavery must be legal in every state of the Union. This judgment drove the two sides further apart than ever.
Why were many southerners pleased by the courts decision in the dread Scott case?
Many Southerners were pleased by the Dred Scott case decision because it upheld the rights of slave owners by ruling that slaves were property and not citizens, which meant they could be taken into any territory in the United States. This decision supported the expansion of slavery and protected the economic interests of slave owners in the South.
Who is dread Scott and why is his case important?
dread scoot is a former slave and his case is not impartant
What effects did the Dread Scott Decision by the Supreme Court have on slavery in the territories as well as on salves themselves?
It declared slavery to be lawful in every state of the Union. Its effect was to heighten the dispute betwen the two sides, and to help bring on the Civil War - which eventually freed all the slaves.
Who helped dread Scott?
Prior to and during the Dred Scott case, only the lawyer who represented him gave him any help. The Supreme Court ruled that no African Americans, whether free or enslaved, had citizenship in the United States, a decision that enraged abolitionists and empowered slave holders. After the decision, Scott's owner married an abolitionist, who persuaded her to return Scott and his family to his original owners. By this time, his original owners were also anti-slavery, and he and his family were freed.
How did the dread Scott decision upset the north?
It upset them because the ruling basically made stated that Congress could not outlaw slavery anywhere because slaves where property of the slave owner, and therefore protected by the 5th amendment.
