Want this question answered?
an experiment that can be controlled i did not know this That is not a good answer! A controlled experiment is: If you set up an experiment: Example: You have two plants. You want to know if fertilizing every day causes it to grow more. In your experiment everything has to be the same! Except one thing. You have to have the same type of dirt and pot and flower/vegetable. You have to water each of them every day. But, you fertilize ONE of them once a day until your results are clear to you, or when you want to stop testing. This way, you can see how the fertilizer effects the plant growth compared to just water every day. If you change more than one thing, like how much you water the plant, it is not a controlled experiment anymore. because then you won't know which variable (thing that you have changed) is taking effect. You wouldn't know if it was more water or the fertilizer, or both that is making the plant grow faster!
Gravity, air resistance, the material of the ball, and the height from which it was dropped initially.
There are several variables in this problem. Different balls have different degrees of elasticity. And then there are different kinds of surfaces on which balls can bounce. A ball does not bounce the same way on a grass lawn that it does on a concrete floor. Also the description "high in the air" is not precise. Different heights can produce different numbers of bounces.
This is the variable which changes as a result of what you change in the experiment. If you change the height from which you drop a ball, you may observe the height to which it bounces. The height of the bounce is the outcome variable.
A bounce ball will bounce the highest!!!!!!!!!
A controlled experiment means that you try to keep all the variables that are involved in the experiment under control apart from the Dependent and the Independent variables to make sure that any results obtained from the experiment have been affected by the independent variable and not some other extraneous variable. It also ensures that the experiment would have high validity. That is, if the experiment has really measured what it was supposed to measure.
The heavy, dense nucleus of the atom caused the alpha particles to bounce back in Rutherford's experiment.
I think both bounce the same one is just bigger then the other, actually the boys basketball bounce higher I did a basketball experiment on it the boys bounce a foot higher, It is because itr weighs more.
an experiment that can be controlled i did not know this That is not a good answer! A controlled experiment is: If you set up an experiment: Example: You have two plants. You want to know if fertilizing every day causes it to grow more. In your experiment everything has to be the same! Except one thing. You have to have the same type of dirt and pot and flower/vegetable. You have to water each of them every day. But, you fertilize ONE of them once a day until your results are clear to you, or when you want to stop testing. This way, you can see how the fertilizer effects the plant growth compared to just water every day. If you change more than one thing, like how much you water the plant, it is not a controlled experiment anymore. because then you won't know which variable (thing that you have changed) is taking effect. You wouldn't know if it was more water or the fertilizer, or both that is making the plant grow faster!
The heavy, dense nucleus of the atom caused the alpha particles to bounce back in Rutherford's experiment.
Gravity, air resistance, the material of the ball, and the height from which it was dropped initially.
he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it. he found out an great outcome from his experiment, he descirbed this result as comparable to shooting a gun at a piece and having having the bullet bounce back. he knew the plum pudding model was correct so he proposed it.
This is the variable which changes as a result of what you change in the experiment. If you change the height from which you drop a ball, you may observe the height to which it bounces. The height of the bounce is the outcome variable.
There are several variables in this problem. Different balls have different degrees of elasticity. And then there are different kinds of surfaces on which balls can bounce. A ball does not bounce the same way on a grass lawn that it does on a concrete floor. Also the description "high in the air" is not precise. Different heights can produce different numbers of bounces.
The alpha particles beam is scattered.
positive
If The egg soaks in White Vinegar then the White vinegare will make the egg bounce the highest.