I'm not sure you can say it at all, both empires were not contemporary, and they weren't established in the same geographical area. The Ottoman Empire controled parts of Iran for a short time, but were eventually overthrown. As for "persians" ever winning over the Turks, I can't think of a single instance.
Well, the Turks would be very different at all. And the Muslims would never had wars, so actually Theo didn't need saladin and the trade was very bad.
You need to explain what transformation you refer to. The transformation of the empire in the west relation to what? You also need to explain why it would need to be accurate/inaccurate.
Because in March of 1095, Byzantine Emperor Alexios I Komnenos had petitioned Pope Urban II of the Catholic Church for help in defending his kingdom which was being attacked by Muslim Turks. Emperor Alexios was hoping that western knights could help his kingdom retake the large swaths of land lost to the Turks. The Pope and numerous nobles from Kingdoms and the Church met at the Council of Piacenza to discuss another matter entirely until the ambassador from the Byzantines arrived. This Crusade would serve several purposes, it would assist the Byzantines, thus strengthening relations between the West and East, and would hopefully re-take Jerusalem and other cities from the Muslim Turks, which had been a priority for many Catholic monarchs, but was not shared by Urban II. In otherwords, they tried to take back the Holy Land from the Muslims. But after the final Crusade, The Muslims maintained controll of the Holy Land.
An artist will actually dress up a noble
the Seljuk Turks captured Jerusalem and would not allow Christians to go on a pilgrimage there Europeans went for fame, fortune, riches, religious beliefs, were absolved from all debt, and they were told by the pope they would go to heaven
I'm not sure you can say it at all, both empires were not contemporary, and they weren't established in the same geographical area. The Ottoman Empire controled parts of Iran for a short time, but were eventually overthrown. As for "persians" ever winning over the Turks, I can't think of a single instance.
I'm not sure you can say it at all, both empires were not contemporary, and they weren't established in the same geographical area. The Ottoman Empire controled parts of Iran for a short time, but were eventually overthrown. As for "persians" ever winning over the Turks, I can't think of a single instance.
It would not be accurate, but there would be some traces of matching dna.
You could do it by saying that all your measurements were 10 centimetres - irrespective of what they actually were. That would be neither precise nor accurate but it sure would be consistent!
The Greeks saw the Persians off, so nothing changed.
Well, the Turks would be very different at all. And the Muslims would never had wars, so actually Theo didn't need saladin and the trade was very bad.
Uh.... no. The Persians lost the war with Greece, and they didn't "give" Sparta anything. It would be more accurate to say the Spartans "gave it to" Persia, with "it" in this case being "a Grecian urn of whoop-ass": at the Battle of Thermopylae between the Persian Army and a Greek force commanded by a Spartan general, the Persians lost 10 times as many men as the Greeks did. However, since they had 15-20 times as many men to start with, the Persians did manage to take the pass after being held off by the Greeks for about a week (including three days of actual battle).
Your doctor would actually be able to provide you with useful information which you would be able to use to create your own 'accurate' weight loss calculator. Otherwise you may want to check with a dieting website, like Weight Watchers.
He was respecting persian customs persians would do that
There would have been ongoing Greek revolutions.
The Bahamas is approximately 323 miles away from Turks and Caicos. A flight would take about an hour to complete on a commercial airline.
They greatly outnumbered the Greeks..