Want this question answered?
The founding fathers create the congressional decision making process to be... slow and deliberative.
Bureaucrats exercise the rule that there is a special high office for every decision making and that crucial decisions are made through a series of senior offices for them to hold. It makes work place decision making unnecessarily slow.
A slow process is a rapid process in which chances over a long period of time
it means it goes slow
The answer depends on how is participative management defined, I assume you mean the style where decision-making is more inclusive and leaders/managers incorporate employees' thoughts, ideas and contributions into overall decision. Here are some disadvantages to keep in mind: 1. Decision-making process can be very slow. This of course depends on what form of participative management is being practiced; if everything requires consensus or majority, speed of decision can be huge problem, and sometimes decisions will not be made at all. 2. It is easy for leaders to abdicate their responsibility in this model because participative management can easily degenerate into decision-by-committe. 3. Decisions can be sub-optimal in many cases if the focus is on remaining participative (and inclusive) and not on making right decision. Here is a good link on this: Participative
It is a fast process.
A slow process of change to the earth's surface can be weathering or erosion.
slow
Slow
Sex me
1. There can be corruption 2. They can give too much attention to a small minority 3. Leaders are usually more extremist than the average member. Therefore, the group can do things their members don't even agree with. 4. They can slow down the political decision making process
It is a fast process.