This question is asking for your opinion not ours. So you need to answer this question because your teacher is looking for your critical thinking.
All dictators try to restrict individual rights of freedom, in order to prevent a revolt that could end their dictatorship.
Whilst this is a matter of opinion, most law-abiding Australian citizens would say that anti-terrorism laws do not infringe on individual human rights. They would rather be safe and endure minor inconveniences than be allowed freedoms that also mean terrorists can easily get through minimal security measures.
These new rules infringe on my rights.
My lawyer made sure noone can infringe upon my rights.
The police officer began to infringe upon my rights when he arrested me without reading me them. The definition of infringe is to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another.
The Bill of Rights was important cuz The Bill of Rights limited government's role and gave the individual certain rights that neither the government nor majority could infringe on.
State's Rights. :)
the n
yes protecting health information
The fallacy is that smoker's rights are ignored
They infringe upon the rights of some groups
Libertarians believe you can't infringe on someone's rights. Therefore libertarians support it.