0
yes ,interface can be defined inside another class
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Can a class write inside an interface?
Yes, you can create a static class inside an interface, but it is normally not a good idea.
Abstract class vs interface?
Comparison between an Abstract Class and an Interface:While an abstract class can define both abstract and non-abstract methods, an interface can have only abstract methods. Another way interfaces differ from abstract classes is that interfaces have very little flexibility in how the methods and variables defined in the interface are declared. These rules are strict:
Why use interfaces in Java?
an Interface is nothing but a contract as to how a class should behave. It just declares the behavior as empty methods and the implementing class actually writes the code that will determine the behavior. When you implement an interface, you're agreeing to adhere to the contract defined in the interface. That means you're agreeing to provide legal implementations for every method defined in the interface, and that anyone who knows what the interface methods look like can rest assured that they can invoke those methods on an instance of your implementing class. (Thy need not bother much about how you have implemented it. All they bother about is whether a method of the name mentioned in the interface is available or not) Now, you might stop me and ask, what if I implement an interface and opt not to write code for a method that I am supposed to? The answer is simple. The compiler wouldn't let you do that. You cannot successfully implement an interface without providing method implementation for all the methods declared inside the interface. This is how the java system ensures that when someone knows a certain method name in an interface and has an instance of a class that implements it, can actually call that method without fear that the method isnt implemented inside the class. Assuming an interface, Convertible, with two methods: openHood(), and setOpenHoodFactor(), the following class will compile: public class Ball implements Convertible { // Keyword 'implements' public void openHood() { } public void setOpenHoodFactor(int bf) { } } Ok, I know what you are thinking now. "This has got to be the worst implementation class that you have seen". Though it compiles and runs as well, it is actually doing nothing… the interface contract guarantees that the class implementing it will have a method of a particular name but it never guaranteed a good implementation. In other words, the compiler does not bother whether you have code inside your method or not. All it cares is if you have methods of the matching names as in the interface. That's all… Implementation classes must adhere to the same rules for method implementation as a class extending an abstract class. In order to be a legal implementation class, a nonabstract implementation class must do the following: • Provide concrete (nonabstract) implementations for all methods from the declared interface. • Follow all the rules for legal overrides. • Declare no checked exceptions on implementation methods other than those declared by the interface method, or subclasses of those declared by the interface method. • Maintain the signature of the interface method, and maintain the same return type (or a subtype). • It does not have to declare the exceptions declared in the interface method declaration
What happens if a class doesn't implement all the methods defined in the interface?
It depends on how the class is declared.If the class is a normal class - Then the compiler will complain. All the methods in an interface must be implemented by the class to successfully compile the classIf the class is declared as abstract - Then the compiler will ignore the fact that a few methods are not implemented
When would you use interface in java?
An Interface is nothing but a contract as to how a class should behave. It just declares the behavior as empty methods and the implementing class actually writes the code that will determine the behavior. When you implement an interface, you're agreeing to adhere to the contract defined in the interface. That means you're agreeing to provide legal implementations for every method defined in the interface, and that anyone who knows what the interface methods look like can rest assured that they can invoke those methods on an instance of your implementing class. (Thy need not bother much about how you have implemented it. All they bother about is whether a method of the name mentioned in the interface is available or not)
Why do you member functions defined outside the class?
A member function of a class can be defined outside the class using scope resolution :: operator Thanks Rajneesh
Why protected access specifier is not in interfaces?
Because an interface is like a contract/skeleton which decides what the implementing class has to do. So, if any entity in an interface is protected, they would not be available to the class that is implementing the interface. Hence, all the variables and methods declared inside an interface are public by default
What is difference between interface and abstract in java?
While an abstract class can define both abstract and non-abstract methods, an interface can have only abstract methods. Another way interfaces differ from abstract classes is that interfaces have very little flexibility in how the methods and variables defined in the interface are declared. These rules are strict: • All interface methods are implicitly public and abstract. In other words, you do not need to actually type the public or abstract modifiers in the method declaration, but the method is still always public and abstract. (You can use any kind of modifiers in the Abstract class) • All variables defined in an interface must be public, static, and final-in other words, interfaces can declare only constants, not instance variables. • Interface methods must not be static. • Because interface methods are abstract, they cannot be marked final, strictfp, or native. (More on these modifiers later.) • An interface can extend one or more other interfaces. • An interface cannot extend anything but another interface. • An interface cannot implement another interface or class. • An interface must be declared with the keyword interface. You must remember that all interface methods are public and abstract regardless of what you see in the interface definition.
What is a predefined interface in java?
An interface is a collection of methods that must be implemented by the implementing class.An interface defines a contract regarding what a class must do, without saying anything about how the class will do it.Interface can contain declaration of methods and variables.implementing class must define all the methods declared in the interfaceIf a class implements an interface and does not implement all the methods then class itself must be declared as abstractVariables in interface automatically become static and final variableof the implementing classMembers of interface are implicitly public, so need not be declared as public.An interface must be implemented in class.
Difference between class and interface in java?
A class is a data type. An interface consists of the private, protected and public members of a class, allowing consumers of the class to interact with the class representation in a controlled manner. The private interface is only accessible to the class itself and to friends of the class. The protected interface is similar to the private interface but is also accessible to derivatives of the class. The public interface is fully accessible. The private and protected interfaces are intended purely for use by the class implementers while the public interface is intended for use by both consumers and implementers.
What is an interface and how will you go about implementing an interface?
an Interface is nothing but a contract as to how a class should behave. It just declares the behavior as empty methods and the implementing class actually writes the code that will determine the behavior. When you implement an interface, you're agreeing to adhere to the contract defined in the interface. That means you're agreeing to provide legal implementations for every method defined in the interface, and that anyone who knows what the interface methods look like can rest assured that they can invoke those methods on an instance of your implementing class. (Thy need not bother much about how you have implemented it. All they bother about is whether a method of the name mentioned in the interface is available or not) Now, you might stop me and ask, what if I implement an interface and opt not to write code for a method that I am supposed to? The answer is simple. The compiler wouldn't let you do that. You cannot successfully implement an interface without providing method implementation for all the methods declared inside the interface. This is how the java system ensures that when someone knows a certain method name in an interface and has an instance of a class that implements it, can actually call that method without fear that the method isn't implemented inside the class. Assuming an interface, Convertible, with two methods: openHood(), and setOpenHoodFactor(), the following class will compile: public class Ball implements Convertible { // Keyword 'implements' public void openHood() { } public void setOpenHoodFactor(int bf) { } } Ok, I know what you are thinking now. "This has got to be the worst implementation class that you have seen". Though it compiles and runs as well, it is actually doing nothing… the interface contract guarantees that the class implementing it will have a method of a particular name but it never guaranteed a good implementation. In other words, the compiler does not bother whether you have code inside your method or not. All it cares is if you have methods of the matching names as in the interface. That's all… Implementation classes must adhere to the same rules for method implementation as a class extending an abstract class. In order to be a legal implementation class, a nonabstract implementation class must do the following: • Provide concrete (nonabstract) implementations for all methods from the declared interface. • Follow all the rules for legal overrides. • Declare no checked exceptions on implementation methods other than those declared by the interface method, or subclasses of those declared by the interface method. • Maintain the signature of the interface method, and maintain the same return type (or a subtype). • It does not have to declare the exceptions declared in the interface method declaration.
Is Iterator a class or Interface?
Its an interface.
