The given sentence is not correct: It should probably read, "What did your last slave die from?", with no "d" on "die". The compound verb form is "did ... die", which was formally named the "intensive past tense" when I was young. In practice, it might as well be called the "interrogative past tense", since it is primarily used to ask questions by separating the two words of the compound verb. However, the tense is also used for emphasis with normal word order, as in, "The mistreated slave did die, even though his rescuers gave him the best medical treatment available."
Whatever the name of the tense, it is formed by combining the auxiliary verb "do", properly inflected for the tense to be intensified, in this instance "did" for the past tense, with the infinitive form of the verb to be intensified, not the past participle of that verb as in the given sentence.
Formal style would also call for the word order to be changed to "From what did your last slave die?", to avoid ending with a preposition.
No, the sentence "What did your last slave die from" would be grammatically correct.
Yes, "similar to" is grammatically correct and commonly used to show a comparison between two things that are alike. For example: "This dress is similar to the one she wore last week."
No, it is not correct to say "Are you going to the park or no." It would be more grammatically correct to say "Are you going to the park or not?"
No, the correct phrasing should be "for the last 10 years" to indicate a period of time that has lasted up to the present moment.
In some varieties, the past tense form is used as a past participle, in place of the different past participle which is used in standard varieties. So this example may be used in some dialects, but it is not grammatical in standard English.
Yes, it is grammatically correct to include a comma after the abbreviation "Co." to separate it from the following word in a sentence. For example, "We visited the Co., headquarters last week."
In some varieties, the past tense form is used as a past participle, in place of the different past participle which is used in standard varieties. So this example may be used in some dialects, but it is not grammatical in standard English.
No, the correct phrasing should be "for the last 10 years" to indicate a period of time that has lasted up to the present moment.
The correct grammar usage here would be: He and I went to the movies last night.
No. That would be "I sang to the baby last night."
"You could not have been" is grammatically correct. "You could not have been at the cinema last night, because I saw you in the park."
That depends on when you use "I am." It's kind of correct to use "I am" as the only words in a sentence if someone asks if you are doing something. It's also grammatically correct to say "I am" after the relative prounoun what. For example, both "You are turning into what I am," and "I am what I am," are grammatically correct.
Yes, the formal and grammatically correct way of addressing yourself and another person is to put yourself last.
How long did the European Slave Trade last?
no. so and so lived in where ever new york. (period) They moved last year. no. so and so lived in where ever new york. (period) They moved last year.
It is, but lacking the commas. In English it's preferred not to keep repeating 'and' and just the articles 'a' until the last object and they're all seperated by a comma.
The last surviving slave may never be found. However, the last living slave that has verifiable proof is Eliza Moore (1843 - 1948).
How long did the European Slave Trade last?